Monday, December 14, 2009

Winter 2010

 To all the readers of this blog:

Congratulations for making it through the first semester!  

I'm glad the notes have helped so many of you.  It's really helped me too.  I plan to do the same notes and tapes for next semester.  And as always, if you want to add to the notes, find something that needs a correction, or have a helpful resource or link, feel free to leave a comment and I will add it.

Have a great winter break!
Sarah B.


Also:
Joel posted this note from Bruce on the Paralegal Google group.
http://groups.google.com/group/uwparalegal/browse_thread/thread/3c45e10a6298c049?hl=en

*******************************************************
 I hope everyone has a safe and happy holiday season, and we’ll see you in January!!  

One more thought…I am currently scheduled for a 5-day arbitration beginning Jan 5th , the first night of class. They normally break at 5:00 pm, which means I should make class on time.  However, if we are in the middle of a witness it could go long, so if I am not there on time, never fear…I am on my way, and class WILL be held.  Since I’m never late, I don’t want anyone assuming its okay to leave at 6:05 pm because I’m probably dead.

Don’t forget to leave milk and cookies for Santa.

Best to all,
Bruce
*******************************************************


Course for Winter 2010        
PARA CP115 A     Litigation Basics       
Class Starts 01/04/2010 through 03/11/2010
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday  6:00pm-9:00pm
Health Sciences Building Wing T, Room 747 

Books For This Class:

WA Local, State, and Federal Rule Books 2010
-will need them starting week 3
-Available here for $213 and free shipping (12/14/09)
-Note: Older rule books are fine too
http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/159759/15581478/productdetail.aspx




Civil Litigation 5th edition by Kerley, Hames and Sukys
-Course #: EDP102382      
-Sections: PARA CP115 A
-ISBN: 9781428318397
-Title:  Civil Litigation (w/out Cd)
-Author:  Kerley
-Available here for $147.50 (12/14/09)
-Note: 4th edition is alright too
http://www.bookstore.washington.edu/default.taf?




Parking Questions:
Commuter Services
206-221-3701
3901 University Way NE
Monday - Friday   7:30am - 3:00pm

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Final Cram Sheet

FINAL CRAM SHEET

Civil Litigation
Rules of procedure
1. Federal
2. State
3. Local

¢ complaint
π plaintiff
∆ defendant
T/P third party

Basic complaint: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counterclaim: Defendant v. Plaintiff
Cross-claim: Defendant v. Defendant
Third Party: Defendant v. Defendant (not named by plaintiff)

Summons:
-formal notice of the suit
-the purpose is procedural due process
-it is procedural, your right to know, right to protect yourself
-summons and complaint must be served together
-server must be over 18 and not a party to the action
-Complaint initiates lawsuit

Affirmative Defense:
-relieves the defendant of liability even if allegations are true
-what do they give you that denials don't?  Nothing specific
Examples:
1. Res Judicata - released the case, case already ruled upon
2. Release - plaintiff releases the defendant from responsibility
3. Contributory Negligence - releases defendant if negligence proved on plaintiff
4. Comparative Negligence - in states where this is true, plaintiff get award even if negligent
5. Statute of Limitations - period of time from date that cause occurred to date filed

Always include:
1. Fails to state a cause of action
------(wore leopard shoes that offended someone) Admitted everything was true
2. Fault of Plaintiff
------ Other person's fault
3. Fault of Another
------ Someone else
4. Failure to Mitigate
----did not reduce injury or damage
   
Counterclaims
1. Compulsory: must bring counterclaim or will never be allowed to do so
2. Permissive: another claim against plaintiff not from the same matter
   
Third party complaint
-upon a person not party to action who may be liable
-what times would you not bring in another party that caused you injury?
    -doesn't know him (guy that fixed brakes for defendant)
    -laziness on rep.
    -relationship (boss, brother in law)
   
Dismissals
1. Involuntary: by opposition or court to throw it out
2. Voluntary: you have the right to dismiss your pleadings
3. With prejudice: it can not be raised again
4. Without prejudice: this is defective but you can try again

subpoena duce tecum
        -documents requiring party to attend and bring documents with them

Trial
Jury Selection - voir dire, speak the truth, from driver's licenses
-Peremptory challenge - attorney may dismiss jurors with no explanation
-Challenges for cause - dismiss juror for bias
-Jury usually 12, District 6
Opening Statements - before evidence, points they plan to make, defense can defer till after plaintiff shows case
-Why is it called that?  Nothing to talk about yet, no evidence
Plaintiff goes first Case in Chief
Direct Examination
-no leading questions, unless hostile, kid, foundation, expert
Cross Examination
-limited to issues in direct
Closing Arguments
-Plaintiff can have 2 closes
Jury Instructions
Jury Deliberations, Verdict, Judgment

CIVIL DISCOVERY
3 purposes:
1. Prepare case thoroughly
2. Clarify
3. Locate, Obtain, Preserve evidence
-The more we find out, the more we can reach settlement
-Federal Rule 26  discovery is broad, but not unlimited (mandatory disclosure)

3 examples where discovery limited
1. Doctor/Patient, spousal immunity, lawyer immunity
2. Work Product - thoughts and mental strategies
3. Experts not being called to witness
4. Annoyance, Embarrassment, Oppression

5 discovery tools
1. Depositions CR30
-non-party or party, oral, under oath, powerful, expensive,
-only tool that is 1. spontaneous 2. against non-party
2. Interrogatories CR33
-party, written, under oath, 30 days, inexpensive, limit 25 questions, discreet subpart
3. Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes CR34
-party, rule 34 request for production
4. Physical and Mental Exams CR35
-party, only if it is an issue, must be relevant
5. Request for Admission CR36
-party, written request or deny, streamlines trial, not really discovery meant to admit things so as not to prove them

-Sanctions available for parties that don't cooperate with discovery
--include: disallowed evidence, established facts, pleadings stricken, contempt, costs incurred
   
CRIMINAL LAW
-felony: loss of civil rights, over a year, in prison
-misdemeanor: 90 days in jail
-mala in se crimes: inherently evil
-mala prohibita: protecting society, revenue raising
-Burden of proof: presumption of innocence, jury, no appeal
-Motive is NOT an element of crime
-All crimes have intent(mental state)
-mens rea: guilty act w/ guilty mind
-actus rea: guilty act w/out guilty mind (the act)

Hate Crimes
-punishing at greater level
-against women, gays
-Matthew Shepard

Insanity
2 tests
1. M'naghten test - inability to tell right from wrong
2. Irresistible impulse (NY rule) - knew it was wrong, could not stop
   
Obligation to Disclose (from Brady)
Inculpatory(guilty) material - supports guilt of defendant
Exculpatory(innocent) material - supports innocence of defendant

Mens Rea w/ Small Children
-below 8, 8-12 presumed no mens rea can be rebutted, over 12 mens rea

Motion to Exclude (suppress)
-4th Amendment (search warrants and evidence) Mapp v. Ohio

Plea bargaining
-none for dangerous felonies, 90% cases are plea bargains

Miranda Warning
-police must give you prior to custodial investigation, must know your rights


Real Property
Fixtures
3 things to look at: (don't need all 3)
1. Attached/Affixed
2. Intent
3. Adaptation

Trade fixtures: goes with tenant 1. usually useless to new tenant 2. expensive
-must 1. repair  2. promptly

Mortgages:
1. Promissory Note: promise to pay
2. Trust Deed: security for note
    -no deficiency judgment and power of sale

Assumption of Mortgage - buyer assumes mortgage of seller(already has mortgage on property) and continue paying on mortgage  Due at sale clause

Subsequent Mortgage - much higher interest rate, risk of loan is increased
Purchase Mortgage - seller contract, installment contract, no bank (strict foreclosure)
Balloon Mortgage - adjustable rate, higher interest rate
Amortization - interest paid first

Easement
1. Appurtenant: dominant tenement can use servient tenement, dominant access to highway
2. Easement in Gross: benefits owner of easement, dominant cattle to pasture

Making an Easement
1. In Writing
2. By Implication - by necessity, you pay for easement
3. By Prescriptive right - start using easement 7-15 years

Co-Ownership
1. Tenancy in Common
-undivided, unlimited owners, different % of ownership, sell your %
2. Joint Tenancy w/ Rights of Survivorship
-when one dies, transfers to other automatically

Warranty Deed: seller has title to what he is selling guarantee
Quick Claim Deed: no guarantee, absolves all interest in property if any

Liens
No lien affidavit: seller claims none
Construction liens; up to 90 days after completion
    1. Mechanic's landscapers, electricians
    2. Materialmen's who supply mechanics

Recording
-public record: warns others of interest in property
-first in time, first in line

Estate Law
Die with Intestacy
-Spouse and Kids, Parents, Siblings, Grandparents, Aunts/Uncles, Escheats to state

Revoke a Will
1. Intentional Destruction
2. Superseding will
3. Interlineation: cross outs, can't add in equal dignities rule

Capacity:
-Competency: extent of property and who heirs
-Over 18

Holographic wills: handwritten by testator, witnessed, no real property
Will needs:
1. In Writing 2. Signed 3. Witnessed by disinterested: receives no benefits

Clauses:
1. Dispositive: to whom and what
2. Residuary: remaining assets

Guardianship Clause: children
Trust Clause: control over money
-inter vivos: in lifetime
-causa mortis: created when you die

-Can not disinherit a spouse

Per Stirpes: direct to children
Per Capita: direct to grandchildren

Probate
Purpose: verify will, inventory of property, satisfy creditors, title transfer
Actual Notice: to known creditors
Constructive Notice: in paper 120 days

Living Will: called Medical Directive
    -medical requests

Domestic Law
Statutory Marriage
1. license  2. marriage ceremony (w/ state authority) 3. competent parties
-if valid elsewhere, valid here

Common Law
1. living as married opposite sex 2. holding themselves as married 7 years

Annulment:
void ab intio
8 Kinds: Sham marriage, Bigamy, Underage, Incest, Mental Competency, Intoxicated, Duress, Physical Incompatibility

Dissolution: Specific Grounds, Minimal Grounds

Alimony (now called Maintenance)
2 forms: Rehabilitative and Permanent

Custody:
Physical and Legal, Usually joint
-Grandparents can not petition to get visitation
"Best interest of the child test"

Full disclosure for divorce:  to avoid Fraud and cause voidable contracts
-document finalizes marriage; interlocutory, after 90 day cooling period

Contracts
-legally binding agreement
3 Parts:  Offer, Acceptance, Consideration(quid pro quo)

Unilateral: personal contracts: usually unilateral
Bilateral: business contracts: agree to perform   
Executed Contract: both parties have already performed
Executory Contract: one party have performed and the other has yet to perform
Express Contracts: parties lay out what they want and why the want it (most oral)
Implied Contracts: must look at conduct to figure out what they want    (ordering food)

Valid Contracts: fully enforceable by the parties, properly formed with O, A, C

Void Contracts: totally unenforceable (never), destructive to society
-2 Types:
    1. Illegal
    2. Violate public policy (paying someone to vote)(money to divorce, inherit)

Voidable Contracts: means one of the parties can opt out of the contract, sometimes enforceable
-Minor, Fraud, Duress, Drunk, Insane, Undue Influence, Bilateral Mistake

Quasi Contracts: not contracts, enforced as one
1. unjust enrichment- allow mistake to occur, knowledge
2. promissory estoppel- create the detrimental reliance, responsible

"meeting of the minds"
"Master of the Offer"- set the circumstances
Objective theory of contracts: how reasonable person perceives offer, is there intent?

Kinds of Offers:
Requirement, Output, Services Needed, Cost Plus, Market Price

Terminate Offer:
1. Reject 
2. Revocation
    -Can not revoke: Options (money given), Detrimental Reliance, Firm Offer
3. Counteroffer
    -original offer lapses
4. Expiration of Time
5. Death
6. Insanity
7. Illegal after acceptance
8. Terms
9. Bankruptcy
10. Acceptance

Acceptance: silence is not acceptance, any manifestation except with Terms
-Mailbox Rule: acceptance of offer upon dispatch, rejection upon receipt

Not Voidable: Necessaries, Release contracts, Student Loans, Life Insurance

Rebutting a Contract:
1. Alcohol, Insanity, Minor
-Minors can disaffirm
2. Bilateral Mistake
3. Fraud: 7 types (material misrep, false, scienter, intent, reliance, reasonable, damanges)
4. Undue Influences: fools
5. Misrepresentation
6. Duress/Coercion

Consideration: legal value, not economic
-Peppercorn Theory: as long as you get something
-Past consideration is no consideration

Usury: illegal rate
 
Statute of Frauds: act for the prevention of frauds and perjuries
   
Must be in writing: (MY LEGS)
Why? Most likely to end up in court
1. Marriage: where marriage is the consideration
2. Year: must not be performable in a year by its terms
3. Land: buying and selling must be in writing
4. Executor of an Estate
5. Goods over $500
6. Surety-ship: signing off on a car loan

Anticipatory Breach (Repudiation not Breach):
-when one party in advance says they are not going to perform
1. Express: tell you they are not going to perform
2. Implied: haven't said they are going to not perform but it is assumed they won't
Remedy:1. Treat the contract as breached and hire someone else, sue for damages
         2. Do nothing and see if the person shows up and performs
               
Third Party Beneficiaries
1. Is the third party beneficiary intended or incidental?
    Incidentals: zero rights (did not mean to get)
    Intended: enforcement rights (meant to get)
2. Assuming intended is the third party beneficiary a creditor or a donee?
    Debt issue: they are a creditor, can sue either party
    If not, Donee: No consideration, it's a gift, can not sue on gift, can sue performer

On the Google Paralegal Group, Jeff W. has posted some exam questions as a download.
http://uwparalegal.googlegroups.com/web/Final+Review.doc?hl=en&gda=7SFR1EMAAACbEQH9Qd1M9dr3IisgL-4I8yWkrbQMLCApzUjeSH-SkL0tOdddf1a8xdn8S_rnmqoytiJ-HdGYYcPi_09pl8N7FWLveOaWjzbYnpnkpmxcWg
 
I also put them onto the Taped Lectures Page for download. 
http://www.soulee.net/Paralegal/Final+Review.doc

Good Luck Everyone!

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Decemeber 8th Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 8, 2009

For LITIGATION
Rule Books for next class
-need Local, State and Federal
-will need them starting week 3
Available here for $213 and free shipping (12/8/09)
http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/159759/15581478/productdetail.aspx

Also Civil Litigation 4edition Kerley, Hames and Sukys

      Course #: EDP102382      
      Sections: PARA CP115 A
      ISBN: 9781428318397
      Title:     Civil Litigation (w/out Cd)
      Author:  Kerley

http://www.bookstore.washington.edu/default.taf?


FINAL
37 questions

Fill in the blank or short answer   19 questions
-14 for 2pts
-4 for 4pts
-1 for 6pts
Most answer in 3 minutes

Multiple Choice    9 questions  all 2pts   18pts    3 minutes to answer
T/F    4 questions    all 2pts   8pts   3 minutes to answer
Short Essay     5 questions     all 24pts   24pts    answer in 60-90 minutes

emphasize breadth not depth



Contracts
-do contracts need to be in writing?
    -No, almost all of the time
    -Always a good idea to have them in writing

-You can have a valid contract that is not enforceable because it's not in writing

"An act for the prevention of frauds and perjuries" from 1677
-called now; Statute of Frauds
    -6 types of contracts must be in writing in order to be enforceable by law

There are the 6 the court will not enforce if not in writing:
(MY LEGS)
1. Marriage
    -when the marriage is the consideration (marry my daughter for company)
    -mutual promises to marry are unenforceable
    -Heart Balm Statutes

2. Year (must performed in a year) **always test on**
    -must not be performable in a year by its terms
    -contract to employ you until baseball teams wins world series
        -does not have to be in writing
        -it could happen next October
        -13 months or longer must be in writing
        -only by its terms it must absolutely happen in a year
        -if it can happen in the year, it does not need to be in writing
    -contract to employ you until baseball teams wins two world series
        -can't happen in one year so it must be in writing

3. Land
    -buying and selling must be in writing
    -you can have an oral lease
    -but most need everything in writing

4. Executor of an Estate
    -the person to carry out your death wishes
    -all contracts must be in writing

5. Goods over $500
    -depends on contract
    -they can be in subcontracted

6. Surety-ship
    -signing off on a car loan

These are the most contentious, most likely to end up in court
-No writing, No court
-does not make the contract invalid, or voidable, simply makes it unenforceable

Two Concepts not in Book:
1. Anticipatory Breach (Repudiation not Breach)
    -when one party in advance says they are not going to perform
    -if they perform after the date, it is a breach
    -if before
    -how can you have a breach when the date has not arrived?
    1. Express
        -tell you they are not going to perform
    2. Implied
        -haven't said they are going to not perform but it is assumed they won't
    Remedy: Victim (innocent party)
            1. Treat the contract as breached and hire someone else and sue for damages at the time you get the repudiation.
            2. Do nothing and see if the person shows up and performs
               
2. Third Party Beneficiaries
    -Contact with employer to pay your tuition
        -You benefit, what are the rights of the employer?

    1. Is the third party beneficiary intended or incidental?
        -every contract benefits someone other than the party
            -incidentals (paint my house, paint company gets money too)
        Incidentals: zero rights (did not mean to get)
        Intended: enforcement rights (meant to get)

            -Employer paying schooling, you are intended
            -if school closes down, you can sue school
            -if its a gift, can't sue employer
            -it its a debt, you can sue employer and school

    2. Assuming intended is the third party beneficiary a creditor or a donee?
        -is this a debt issue?
        -If so, they are a creditor.
            -Forgive debt if Holly babysits kids of Kyle who loaned Bruce money
                -Kyle is creditor and intended
                    -Kyle can sue either party for performance
        -If not, they are a donee.
            -Forgive the debt to Bruce by working at the mission
                -mission is a donee and intended   
                    -mission can sue you but not Bruce
                    -why?  No consideration, it's a gift, can not sue on gift

Monday, December 7, 2009

December 7th Notes

Legal Research & Writing
December 7th

Statement of Facts
-all legally significant facts
    -case based arguments
-background facts
    -time line of the case
    -client and problem
-Conclude with what you were asked to do
"You asked me to find out if Orca was constructively evicted..."

Issue Statement
-use under/does/when
Under WA common law, was Orca constructively evicted when...(facts from your case based arguments, 1 fact for each element)
-Good goal about 75 words
Contains a specific clause governing air handling system,
include facts of the case, air handling, repainting the yachts
Gripp all confirmed fumes ruined the paint
Orca repeated requests (5)
Orca moved out
-make sure it is a question

What facts to include:
    -Landlord's Act
    -Notice
    -Vacate
    -Untenantable
Parallelism

Conclusion
-begin by connecting
-hedge words possibly, probably, likely
-what will court
-must include constructive eviction

Because it satisfies all four elements,
-include the words "constructive eviction"
-Your recommendations
-how does constructive eviction arise
    -is an affirmative defense to action on contract
    -demand for payment of rent due, landlord suing for money

-what could orca do
no reason to send money to amber, we shouldn't file a lawsuit, we should send a letter to amber claiming the strength of constructive eviction
-may want to seek damages from amber for the repainting of the yachts

Revising
-get all the pieces together then
-past tense for other cases
-present tense for Orca

Editing
-word choice
--landlord &tenant terms for decided cases
--use orca, amber, aloha for our case

-lease clause pertaining to the air handling system's maintenance
-find "of" in the document and delete them.

first is full
every rule sentence---- pinpoint to wash reporter
all quotations
chunk paragraph for case--short form
no cites in argument section

courts do not argue, claim, allege, assert
courts, find, hold, conclude, observe, opine, rule

appellate courts can not find facts

www.readplease.com
From the first memo stuff


Background Facts on Orca:
Orca: professional yacht painter
    -owner, Gripp-All paint, include price of paint job
        Orca is well-known for its exquisite work in painting yachts, a reputation that took many years to build and is now in danger of being ruined.

Cost to yacht owner to paint a mega-yacht depends upon its size, ranges from $50,000 to
$500,000. Bennett’s costs to re-paint are about 60 – 75% of that amount depending upon the
amount of re-fairing that has to be done.

Bennett uses exclusively Gripp-All2 paint, which is designed specifically for use on fiberglass
yacht surfaces, and follows all of the manufacturer’s recommendations for its application.
Bennett turned to Gripp-All to determine what might be causing the problems, but Gripp-All
had no answers.

Amber: Real estate property manager

Aloha: Plastics textiles manufacturing for Yachts
    - owner

What the problem is:
As a result of the re-painting, Bennett’s once profitable business is losing money.
-Breach of contract
    -Look for Damages

-Constructive Eviction
    -Leasehold
    -Tenant is ousted by landlord
        -Did the landlord push him out?
        --Constructive Eviction (constructive = legal fiction)
-The landlord constructively put the tenant out by not making the land suitable for use

What were asked to do:
Sept. 18   Amber sent Bennett a letter demanding payment for the back rent (June, July, Aug., and Sept.) and for the remainder of the 7 year lease.

Bennett(Orca) wants to know what recourse he has.

Chronological list of facts:
include paragraph 9, quote
Official Listing

-Mar. 2007        -Orca leases 80,000 sq. ft. Westlake Bldg.
-July 2008        -Orca tries to lease the other 40,000 sq. ft.
-Sept. 2008        -Amber leases other 40,000 sq. ft. to Aloha
-Jan. 2009        -Orca's paint problems begin
-Feb. 2009        -Bennett's night visit; tells Gripp-All & Amber
-Feb. 9, 2009    -Letter from Gripp-All to Orca
-Feb. 16, 2009    -Orca letter to Amber; Bennett stops painting
-Mar. 1, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Mar. 18, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Apr. 3, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Apr. 15, 2009    -Bennett hears nothing, Bennett calls Aloha & learns details of second shift; calls Amber - nothing.
-Apr. 16, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, tells about Aloha call, nothing
-May 15, 2009    -Orca moves out of Westlake Bldg.
                              -Orca sends letter to Amber
-Sept. 18, 1009    -Amber letter demanding payment

Friday, December 4, 2009

December 3rd Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 3, 2009

General Assent
- free, informed, & voluntary

1. Alcohol - insanity - minor
    -no meeting of the minds
    -child can not give consent

-Dealing with Minors
    -Minor can disaffirm a contract
    -When you deal with minors they can void a contract at any time
        -even after a reasonable time once they are 18
    -***a contract is voidable at the option of the minor***

-Contracts with Minors that are Not Voidable
1.Contracts of necessaries
    -food, shelter, health insurance, clothing
2. Release Contracts
    -personal injury release
3. Student Loans
4. Life Insurance

Aftermath of a Minor disaffirming:
Traditional : Adult gets nothing, do not deal with minors
Modern: Minor has a duty to return anything left, and pay for part used
Very Modern: Make the adult whole


-If the Minor lied about their age:
Traditional: Doesn't matter, do not deal with minors
Modern: Minor loses right to disaffirm if they lie about their age

-Parents are not liable for their children's contracts

Alcohol
-intoxicated by drugs or alcohol
-must be so much they had no idea what was going on

Insane
-K are voidable
-if they have a guardian, the contract is void

2. Bilateral mistake
    -you have an obligation to find out details of the deal
    -in some circumstances it can be voidable

3. Fraud
    -1. material misrep. of fact
    -2. false
    -3. scienter (knowledge)
    -4. intent to induce
    -5. actual reliance
    -6. reasonable
    -7. damages

4. Undue influence
    -confidential relationship
    -unfair bargain
        -one party fools another into signing a contract
        -usually family taking advantage of other family members

5. Misrepresentation - 6 parts

6. Duress/Coercion
    -never really see this happen except really hard economics times



How to have a contract:
Offer
    -definite
    -communicated to offeree
    -10 ways to terminate

Acceptance
    -any manifestation of assent (not silence)
    -"master of offer" otherwise any reasonable method
    -mailbox rule

Consideration
    -legal valve, not economic value
        -both parties do not need equal value
    (anything the promisor has a legal rights to do or refrain from doing)
    -ample consideration
    -illusory
    -past/legal duty

    -Peppercorn Theory:
        -old English cases where a house can be considered for a peppercorn   
        -as long as each party is getting something
            (courts don't care if it's a bad deal)

-If there are no considerations, it is a gift
    -Example: "I'll pass you." (no requirements from you)
    -gifts are unenforceable

Past consideration is no consideration.
    -consideration has already taken place
    -Example: "Paint my house, for the rides I gave you!"
        -Not a contract, needs to be something new ("Paint my house for a ride next week.")
    -Doesn't count if you are required by law or contract to do it
        -firefighters, must put out fires can't ask for payment
"ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration"
    -boilerplate reference to make sure the consideration is met

Objective theory of Ks (not subjective intent)
Master of the Offer (bears the risk of misunderstandings in manner/method of acceptance)
"Meeting of the minds"


Exception to the rule of consideration for each side:
1. Pledges to Charity
    -there is consideration to the charity
    -quasi-contract formed
        -detrimental reliance to the charity

2. Modify a contract for the sale of goods

-Courts do not generally examine the sufficiency of consideration
    -illusory consideration
        -later seeing consideration is only on one side
        -promise to do something but don't have to do it
    -unconscionability
        -one side has a greater value consideration than the other

Usury
    -charging illegal rate
    -Banks, credit unions exempt
    -really made for loan sharks

Licenses
    -contract for services to perform and they are not properly licensed
    -failure of consideration
        -if it requires certificate of competency than it is failure
    -mala prohibita: not morally reprehensible (bad thing but not a true crime)

Agreements to not compete
    -employment contracts where they can not work in the field/miles
        -truly are illegal contracts on restraint on trade
        -BUT the law does enforce them though
            -as long as they are reasonable in scope and time
       
*******Contracts are easy to form but many are not enforceable*******


REVIEW FOR FINAL

Start page 219

Civil Litigation
    -lightly covers this, no essay, just the basics
    -some questions covered in class
    -basic formats, Not where things go
    -Need to know: complaint, counter claim, cross-claim, third party complaint,
    -Summons: explain due process, role of a summons
    -nothing on serving,  *who can serve though* paralegals can serve!
    -no pleadings
    -affirmative defense: what do they give you that denials don't
        -nothing specific

    Counterclaims
        -permissive rather than compulsory
            -one has to be done
            -same nexus of operative facts (same event)
            -must be brought or you give up the right to bring it up
                -why? repeat traffic, it is the same lawsuit
    Third party complaint
        -what times would you not bring in another party that caused you injury?
            -doesn't know him (guy that fixed brakes for defendant)
            -laziness on rep.
            -relationship (boss, brother in law)
    No defaults, no motions, no subpoenas
    Dismissals
        -involuntary or voluntary
            -involuntary (by opposition or court to throw it out)
            -voluntary (you have the right to dismiss your pleadings)
        -with prejudice or without prejudice
            -with (it can not be raised)
            -without (this is defective but you can try again)

    subpoena duce tecum
        -documents requiring party to attend and bring documents with them

    trials, nothing in depth
    jury selection -
        false used to be registered voters, now it comes from driver's licenses
        book wrong

    voir dire - french "to speak the truth"
    Page 251
        peremptory challenge -
        challenges for cause -
    Jury usually 12
    district 6
   
    Why is it called an opening statement?
        -no evidence presented, nothing to talk about yet
   
Direct examination
    -civil trial has both right to cross examine
        -criminal too
    -only that the other side discussed

CIVIL DISCOVERY
-what it is, where we are going with this
page 265 Why?  the more we find out, the more we can reach settlement
-federal rule 26  how broad that is, but not unlimited
-3 examples where discovery limited page 267
        -doctor, lawyer, spouse
        -work product
        -lacking relevance
    -why it is better to have injustice done in trial than destroy
        importance of confidentiality
page 271
    -5 discovery tools
        advantages and disadvantages

most from notes, some book, just from class discussion

discreet subpart:
    -separate interrogatory (can not get around them with extras)
physical and mental examinations:
    -must be relevant topic in lawsuit, be an issue in the lawsuit

All short essays

request for admissions
    -streamlines trial
    -need to do homework in order to use this
    -are one of the five tools but not discovery at all
    -using it to use the other side to admit things so you dont have to prove them
        -they do not discover anything, not learning information
            -to simply and streamline trial

-sanctions available for parties that don't cooperate with discovery
    -problems

CRIMINAL LAW
-not a lot on the examination

-mala in se, mala prohibita
-motive is an element of crime: false
-do not confuse motive and intent (mental state) did you know?

-hate crimes women, sexual orientation

-insanity: know the two tests M'naghten test and irresistible impulse (NY rule)
    -must be insane legally

criminal law burden of proof
    -presumption of innocence, jury, no appeal

Mens re
small children do under 8 , 8-12, over 12
Not all minors are small children
get rid of presumption - rebutt the presumption
page 308
Discovery
-exculpatory: you did it and
-inculpatory:
---know the reversal Brady v. maryland

what amendment 4th: suppressing evidence  Matt v. Ohio
exclusion of evidence

Miranda rights and decisions

Tuesday: contracts and then finish review

No essays, just short answers

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

December 1st Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 1, 2009


Books for next set of classes are very expensive.
Books: Local, State, Federal Rules
Perkins law firm may be offering them. WA Rule books, can be any year. Every law firm has them, call around town.


***FINAL next week***

Contracts
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration

Offer
- someone has to initiate process, to enter a K(contract)
1. Must be definite (clear)
2. Communicated to the offeree

- When courts look at K was there a "meeting of the minds"
- Offers can not be third party (watch example)
-Just looking to see if there was intent, keep it simple

Exception to Rule:
Nordstrom ad in paper for shoes
-yes it is definite, yes communicated to offerees
-it's an offer to negotiate
-they may not have enough shoes for the entire city, not unlimited supply

Exception to the Exception:
-merchant puts specific specificity in the ad
- 4 at this price, while they last, first come first serve basis, vin # in car ads

Statements that are not Offers
1. Offers made in jest (joking about selling car for $1)
-if a reasonable person perceives it as a real offer, it may not be in jest
-"Objective Theory of Contracts"  how the reasonable person next to you perceives offer, is there intent?
 Example:
"I'd really love to sell you my stereo"
-is it definite? YES why? sounds like commercial, sounds believable to OTC
-is it communicated to the offeree? YES

2. Social Invitations

3. Offers to negotiate or receive offers from others

Special Kinds of Offers
1. Requirements contract offers
- I will buy all the carrots I need.

2. Output contract offers
-I will buy all the carrots you have.

3. "Services as needed" contract offers
-lawnmowing as needed

4. "Cost plus" contract offers
-sell plus a profit %

5. Contract offers referring to market price


Ways to terminate an offer
-offers do not come back to life once they are terminated, the offer is lapsed
-it must be a new offer
1. Rejection
-rejected from the offeree

2. Revocation
-when the offeror takes back an offer
-at any time, even if he said he will not revoke the offer
Some offers can not be revoked:
1. Options
-give money to keep offer open (a consideration)
2. Situations involving detrimental reliance
-relying on the fact the offer is open (moving for a job)
3. Firm Offer
-signed promissory note to not revoke (merchant's usually)

3. Counteroffer ***(always asked on final)***
-if the offeree makes an offer to the offeror the original offer dies
-I won't give you $500 for the watch, but will give you $300.
-can not change your mind and take original offer, it was terminated
mirror image rule:
-any slight deviations terminates the offer and is a counteroffer
-most courts have gone away from this rule
-examples: payments plan, value of extra items

4. Expiration of Time (reasonable)
-putting a time frame on the offer
-finding decade old ad in box is no longer an offer
-depends on item for sale: gold coin, ice cream cone, used car

Can not form a contract if:
5. Death of either party
6. Insanity of either party

7. Illegality after the offer but before the acceptance
-if the subject matter was illegal when the contract was formed it was void
-needs to be illegal after the offer

8. Terms
-offers lapse when they say they will
-specific terms in the offer
"Master of the Offer" - the offeror sets the circumstances of the offer

9. Bankruptcy
-the bankrupt party can no longer can accept contracts
-the party in charge of their bankruptcy is in charge of their contracts

10. Acceptance
-when the offer is accepted, it becomes a contract

Acceptance
-any manifestation of assent (agreement)
-only exception is terms (it may say it needs to be accepted in a certain way)

Silence is not acceptance
-You can't force acceptance on an offeree
-Exception: if the offeree says silence can be acceptance

The mailbox rule ***will be on final***
-acceptance of an offer binding upon dispatch
-once I write a letter, I accept offer to buy the car then mail it
-rejection/revocation of an offer is binding upon receipt
Example: page 424 Sally and Mark offer
-the offer is not revoked, there was a valid acceptance prior to revoke
-they needed to add terms to the offer regarding acceptance/revocation

Competent Parties
-must be competent, same as marriage and wills
-low standard
-general presumption you are competent
-what you have and heirs

Monday, November 30, 2009

November 30th Notes

Legal Research & Writing
November 30th


Outline for Memo
-Statement of Facts
    -This is where the facts of Orca go here
-Issue Statement
-Discussion
-Conclusion

-Work on the Discussion section first.  This reduces the time to write the memo.

Rules Section Review
-No cases, No facts

General Rules
    1.-where did the doctrine originate (cite WA Practice) Stoebuck's
    2.-explanation or definition ("occurs when"... in the cases)(needs citation w/pin point from Washington Official Reporter)
    3.-list of the elements of constructive eviction (4 of them)
        -each is rule and requires citation to authority w/pinpoint
        -no single case with all 4, use several
        -list all 4 elements, then list cases with ;

Transition (Undisputed Elements)
    -Undisputed elements
    -Landlord's Act (from previous class notes)
Landlord's Case
The first element, landlord's act, is likely undisputed. 

For a constructive eviction to occur, it must be the act of the landlord or someone acting on the behalf of the landlord that is the cause of the interference to the the tenant, (no Pacific Reporter)

In Orca's case, this element is satisfied because it was Amber, the landlord, who gave permission to Aloha to begin the second shift operation that was caused the paint problems for Orca.


        -identify the element and tell that it is undisputed
        -provide explanation of the element with citation (pinpoint )
            -From case law "Needs to be the landlord or someone acting for the landlord.  And that's what caused the interference."
        -apply the explanation to the facts of Orca's case

    -Notice
        -identify the element and tell that it is undisputed
        -provide explanation of the element with citation (pinpoint )
            -Notice of the interference (tenant required to talk to landlord about interference so landlord has time to remedy)
            -NOT about vacating

        -apply the explanation to the facts of Orca's case

    -Vacate
        -identify the element and tell that it is undisputed
        -provide explanation of the element with citation (pinpoint )
            -Tenant to vacate property within a reasonable time
        -apply the explanation to the facts of Orca's case
        -Last sentence: Consequently, the only element that Amber can likely dispute is whether the premises are untenantable. 
            -Amber has the burden of proof, they will raise the issue

Specific Rules for Untenantability (Disputed)
    -Discussed 3 in class, write sentence for each one, follow each with a sentence with citation to authority, include pinpoint.
    -"... they focused on the severity of the interference, the degree of the landlord's control over the leased space, and the degree of specificity about the interference in the lease."(string cite here)(See signal)
   
Mottman Mercantile Co v. Western Union Telegraph (1940) 3 Wash. 2nd. 62
----Has definition of untenantable
----Must be used in specific rules
    -"...'untenantable and unfit for occupancy,' as used in leases, mean simply a condition which renders the premises unsatisfactory for the normal conduct of the tenant's business;..."

Analogous Case Presentation
-Orca's cases
-Amber's cases
Develop principle based topic sentence to introduce the case based cases
    -Better to write a nice intro sentence for each case to show immediately why we are using them
    -Explain why the case is important, explain central principle and explain what you have learned

"For instance in Aro Glass, the tenant leased space to use for a used car lot and in the lease, the landlord agreed to correct the deep puddles that occurred on the lot because the tenant knew that this would drive potential customers away.  The landlord failed in several attempts to correct the puddles and the tenant moved out. Aro Glass, 12 Wn. App. 6

Arguments
-Orca's Arguments
    -Plain
    -Analogous
    -Policy
-Amber's Arguments
    -Plain
    -Analogous
    -Policy

General Argument Sequence
Plain - gets the argument started
Analogous - most important arguments
Policy - helpful, but think broadly

Plain
-begins with an assertion
-uses the words of the statute or doctrine
-supports assertion using facts of the client's case


-begins with an assertion
Orca will argue that its situation is untenantable... because the Westlake Building is not fit for properly painting yachts, the purpose for which it leased the premises. 

-uses the words of the statute or doctrine
 to claim constructive eviction the interference must cause the premises to be unfit for their intended purposes John B. Stevens & Co v. Pratt, 119 Wash. 232, 234, 205 P. 10 (1922).

-supports assertion using facts of the client's case
Orca will argue that its situation is untenantable... because the Westlake Building is not fit for properly painting yachts, the purpose for which it leased the premises.  Orca told Amber about its specific painting requirements; Amber permitted Aloha to use the chemicals that are causing the poor quality paint finish on the yachts and did nothing to bring the building's air handling system into compliance.  As a result, Orca cannot use the premise for painting yachts, the purpose for which it leased the building. 

Analogous Arguments
1. Assertion
2. Comparison of Facts

Comparison
-Aro
--tenant identified need to correct puddles
--tenant knew the puddles would drive customers away
--landlord tried to correct puddles

-Orca
--Orca gave specifications to Amber for paint before lease signed and wanted paragraph 9 provision
--Orca knew problems with air, debris, would cause problems
--Amber ignored repeated requests for correction

Assertion
-Orca's situation is more untenantable than the one in Aro Glass.  There before signing the lease, the tenant told the landlord that the puddles needed to be eliminated just like Orca gave the paint specifications to Amber and negotiated the clause in the lease about its needs.  In Aro Glass, the landlord at least attempted to remedy the problem, but Amber never even attempted to correct the problem with the air handling system. 

Comparison
-WA Chocolate
--tenant leased for chocolate storage
--rats came from landlord space to tenant and invaded space ruining beans
--landlord tried to correct and failed

-Orca
--Orca leased the premises for painting yachts
--Amber retained obligation to maintain air handling system in buildings chemicals from aloha ruined paint
--Amber ignored repeated requests for correction

-Assertion
Orca's situation is more untenantable than the situation in WA Chocolate.  In the case of WA chocolate, the tenant obtained the lease for a specific use just like Orca leased the space from Amber to paint yachts.  In WA Chocolate, the interference of rats from the landlord was so severe that the tenant's property was seized, but Amber's lack of interference caused the paint to ruin on the yachts. 

Comparison
-Lindblom
--landlord changed staircase and rented hallway to hucksters
--the hucksters blocked the hallway
--the tenants businesses suffered

-Orca
--Amber allowed a second shift for Aloha without letting Orca know of the extra stress on the air filter
--Orca could not paint yachts and the business suffered
--Amber ignored repeated requests for correction

-Assertion
Orca's situation is more untenantable than the situation in Lindblom.  In the case of Lindblom, the tenant's businesses suffered due to the landlord's actions just like Orca's business suffered from Amber's action of allowing Aloha a second shift operation.  In Linblom, the landlord changed the staircase without informing tenants, just like when Amber did not inform Orca of the additional shift at Aloha.


Comparison
-John B. Stevens
--tenant asked for warehouses and docks to be repaired
--the landlord promised to repair
--the landlord ignored the repairs

-Orca
--Orca complained to Amber that they could not paint boats
--Amber had an obligation in paragraph 9 to maintain
--Amber ignored repeated requests for correction

-Assertion
Orca's situation is more untenantable than the situation in John B. Stevens.  In the case of John B. Stevens, the tenant complained that repairs were needed to the warehouse and docks just like Orca complained to Amber about the need for the air filter to be maintained. In John B. Stevens, the landlord ignored the repairs just like when Amber ignored the repairs for Orca.

-These are quick mash-ups that need more information and flow.

Policy Argument
-Examine reasons why legislature enacted the statute of why the court adopted a doctrine
-use those reasons to support your argument

Why does untenantability have to be there before constructive eviction can be found?
-Avoiding a lease is a serious outcome (need to keep people in leases)
    -small problems should not let tenants avoid leases

This is a better argument for Amber.
-tenant can not leaves leases easily

This may not be a good argument for Orca.
-can not force a person to stay in unacceptable conditions
-not a small issue when a property is unusable, it's a serious issue with contract
-landlord must be responsible to tenant

Amber will argue that policy supports its position.  Courts require untenability because avoiding a lease is a serious consequence.  Permitting tenants to use minor interferences to avoid leases that are no longer economically beneficial to them encourages wrong behavior.  Here, Orca located the larger space it tried to obtain in the Westlake Building and at a lower cost, both are economic benefits, Moreover, as state by the paint manufacture, Orca can use Gripp-All1 paint without problem in the Westlake Building. 


Mini-Conclusion
-1 or 2 sentences
-include the word untenantable  DO NOT include constructive eviction
-predict how the court will rule
-use "hedge word"  likely, probably, possibly
-use connector word page 719, 602, 603
-reader should be in agreement due to your previous statements

As a result, it is probable that the court will find that the premises are untenantable.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Novemeber 24th Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
November 24, 2009

Review Dec 3rd
Page 219 to end of book


Dissolution
    -not called Divorce anymore
   
Statutory Marriage
1. license
2. marriage ceremony (w/ state authority)
3. competent parties (understand what you are doing)


-states and other countries vary with what marriage is, if the marriage is valid where you entered it, it is valid everywhere else
-WA will hold it valid if it is valid elsewhere  Article IV § 1

Common Law Marriage
1. parties of opposite sex living as a married couple
2. holding themselves at married in the public for a minimum period of time set by statute (generally 7 years)


-WA does not have common law marriage
-Creditors, like banks, do not like people not saying they are married later for joint liability

Palimony
-Marvin v. Marvin 1976
-were not married but she took his name, had joint banking, and he stated he could get half of his possessions
-more of a contract issues
    -promissory estoppel
    -unjust enrichment

Dissolution of Marriage
Annulment
-declare the marriage was never valid
-void ab initio (from the beginning)
-limited grounds for an annulment
    1. Sham Marriage: no one intended for the marriage (usually green card)
    2. Bigamy: can't have two spouses at same time, second marriage is void
    3. Underage Party: can't be under 18 or 16 w/ parental consent
    4. Incest: can not marry relatives, WA can not marry cousins (usually 1st)
    5. Mental Incompetency: contractual competency
    6. Intoxication: need to be very drunk to the point you don't know
    7. Duress: forcing marriage (shotgun wedding)
    8. Physical Incompatibility: refusal to ever have sex

Dissolution
1. Specific Grounds are required
-all 50 states are "no fault" meaning, you do not need grounds to divorce, no proof needed
    -You once had to prove: (no longer the case)
        -mental cruelty, adultery, abandonment, physical abuse
-WA does not require any specific statements
    -others just want it stated specifically

2. Minimal Grounds
    1. allege "irretrievably broken" or irreconcilable differences
    2. minimal residency requirement meet
        -court has an interest in your marriage
        -Nevada has a quicker divorce because the residency is easy 6 weeks

-if your spouse wants to divorce you, there is nothing you can do
    -you can slow it down w/ counsel or tactics to save marriage
    -interlocutory period (cooling off period)
        -WA is 90 days

-You can do a divorce by yourself with
Complete agreement on:
1. Property
2. Custody
3. Support (spousal and child)
-otherwise you will need a lawyer

Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
-petitioner (filer) and respondent

Custody
-WA visitation rights
    -Grandparents can not petition for visitation rights

Alimony (now called Maintenance)
    Two forms
    -Rehabilitative
    -Permanent

Custody
    -Physical Custody
        -where the child is, who's care
    -Legal Custody
        -responsibility of making decisions on the child's behalf
   
    -Joint Custody
        -courts prefer to split both
        -if travel is hard, legal custody is still split
    -if you can not split custody (generous visitation)

"Tender Years Doctrine"
    -children under 5 belong with mother
    -old school thinking
Now is: "Best interest of the child test"
        -who is the caretaker of the child (usually the woman)

Division of Property
-as long as it is done without coercion and with full disclosure
    -property agreement, does not have to be 50/50
    -important for both parties to have their own lawyers
        -in case there are challenges
    -community property statements
        -become tenants in common instead
    -not everything is community property
        -gifts, wills, some property

Division of Indebtedness
-responsibility of outstanding debt
    -judges decision on debt is not binding on creditors
        -take all debt responsibility
            -then you split the assets
$200,000 in assets
$140,000 in debt
take the debt and get $170,000 in assets
-that way you don't have to worry about spouse defaulting
-2 list property approach (make two list that are equal in value and give to spouse)

Final judgment of dissolution of marriage
    -document finalizes marriage (after 90 day cooling period)
    -either side can finalize it, not the petitioner


Contracts
-law is basically contracts, torts and criminal law

K = contracts

contracts
    -legally binding agreement
    (promises can be broken because they are not enforceable)

3 Parts of a Contract
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration - quid pro quo (this for that)

-need some understanding
-competency
-legal agreements

-in order for there to be a valid contract you only need 3, but to enforce it, it must be in writing

-damages you seek are to make you whole after the breach (varies on what you are seeking)
    -personal service contractors can not be enforced with specific performance
         (making a painter paint a house, then he ruins the house leading to another lawsuit)

Common law of Contracts
   
UCC - Uniform Commercial Code
    -bulk sale transfers, banking system
    -to get all the states to agree on business contractors
    -Louisiana does not have this, they use Napoleonic Code

Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts
Unilateral:
    -personal contracts: usually unilateral

Bilateral:
    -business contracts: agree to perform   

Executed Contract:
    -both parties have already performed

Executory Contract
    -one party have performed and the other has yet to perform

Express Contracts
    -parties lay out what they want and why the want it (negotiating)
    -oral or writing (most contracts are oral)

Implied Contracts
    -must look at conduct to figure out what they want
    (ordering food)

Valid Contracts
    -fully enforceable by the parties
    -properly formed with O, A, C

Void Contracts
    -totally unenforceable (never)
    2 Types
    1. Illegal
    2. Violate public policy 
(paying someone to vote)(money to divorce, inherit)
        -destructive to society

Voidable Contracts
7 Types
(means one of the parties can opt out of the contract)
    -they are sometimes enforceable
-Minor: minor can leave anytime
-Fraud:
-Duress: forced into contract
-Drunk:
-Insane:
-Undue Influence: usually family or friend
-Bilateral Mistake: both think they are dealing with the same thing but not
    (either party can opt out)

Quasi Contracts (are not contracts) ("pretend")
-even though it is enforced as one
1. unjust enrichment- allow mistake to occur
    -people should not be allowed to benefit from others mistakes when they have knowledge just to get the benefit
    -painters coming to paint a house without a contract because they painted the wrong house

2. promissory estoppel- create the detrimental reliance
    -being stopped from making promises that are not enforced   
    -makes you responsible for the promises you make
    -"we could really use a guy like you" is not a job offer

*we pretend to prevent injustice

Monday, November 23, 2009

November 23rd Notes

Legal Research & Writing
November 23rd

Possible Amber cases:
Matzger v. Arcade Bldg. & Realty Co., 102 Wash. 423, 173 P. 47 (1918).
  
Analogous Case Arguments
-fact to fact comparison between a decided case and the facts of your client's case
-precedent base
-favorable
-distinguishing
-use words of comparison (just like, similar to)

Case Based Arguments (analogous)
Compare Orca to WA Chocolate
-In the case of WA Chocolate, the warehouse became infested with rats due to the lack of maintenance by the landlord.
-Similarly in the Orca case, the air filtration system came into disrepair and caused issues with Orca's business.

Compare Orca to Aro Glass
-Aro had a stipulation in their lease that the landlord would fix the puddles for the business.
-In Orca's case has a paragraph in their lease that the air filtration is vital to the business.

Compare Orca to John B. Stevens
-John B. Stevens found that the landlord was negligent and failed to keep the docks in good repair, even after notice.
-Orca notified Amber of the air filtration problem and they did nothing about the issues

Compare Orca to Lindblom
-Lindblom allowed hucksters to use the hotel causing a loss of business to the hotel.
-In Orca's, Amber allowed second shift for Aloha that caused damage to Orca's business.

Compare Amber to Farrow
-Farrow, movie goers were not coming because of the Depression, an external circumstances not due to tap dancing.
-Amber There is another kind of paint that Orca can use that does not cause the issue.

-each case has another renter in the building
-external circumstances  (depression, poor quality of movie equipment)
-Amber should review Orca's cases and give how the facts are not comparable

Rebuttal Arguments
-Farrow's case v. Orca case
-Orca needs to use the mirror finish paint to please their customers because they are yacht owners.

-Both cases were bringing the lawsuit as an excuse for poor business.  Tap dancing was not the main cause.  It was depression and equipment.  Orca is using the paint as an excuse to get a cheaper rent and more space that they wanted.
-fact of cheaper rent
-lost space to Aloha

-Orca would argue that they tried to buy the space from Amber prior to Aloha at the higher rent rate.  So there is not underlying motivation.

Orca's Cases
-Aro
-WA chocolate
-Stevens
-Lindblom

Amber's
-Farrow
-Matzger
-Distinguishing Orca's cases

Can Amber distinguish the cases?
Aro Glass:
    -Aro glass had no other choice
    -Orca has another choice and can use another paint product backed up by manufacturer

WA Chocolate:
    -WA could not control where the rats were coming from because of other tenants.  Health dept had to shut it down to protect public.
    -Orca Amber can not control the chemicals used by Aloha (but that statement may not want to be used because it plays well for Orca)  The chemicals can't be so harmful since the health dept. is not shutting Aloha down. (it doesn't leave to an untenantable situation)

John B. Stevens
    -Stevens the entire building was effected and deteriorated
    -Orca Amber only the air filtration system was effected and can be fixed.  (does not shine well on Amber)

Lindbloom
    -Lindblom could not perform business because of other vendors bring property value down.
    -Orca Amber could state that because Aloha is actually another yacht accessory vendor it should bring more business in.

STATEMENT
ISSUES STATEMENT
DISCUSSION SECTION OUTLINE
Introduction
    -General Rules Paragraph
    -Transition (Roadmap Paragraph)
        -Undisputed
            -Landlord's Act (cite case)
            -Notice (cite case)
            -Vacate (cite case)
        -Disputed
            -Untenantable (cite cases)
Disputed Element - untenantable
    -Specific Rules -  untenantable
    -Analogous case presentation
        -Cases favoring Orca
        -Cases favoring Amber
Arguments
    -Orca's arguments
        -Fact based (plain)
        -Case based (analogous)
        -Policy based
    -Amber's arguments
        -Fact based (plain)
        -Case based (analogous)
        -Policy based
    -Orca's Rebuttal
Mini-Conclusion - untenantable
CONCLUSION


Present our case first then the other
    -do not intermingle them
    -present all your cases first then other
    -Concise but clear
    -there are 4 cases

3 Things you must tell reader about each case:
1. Outcome
    -untenantable or not
2. Reasoning
    -reason why
3. Facts  
    -as they relate to the outcome and reasoning
    -facts that showed untenantable

Develop principle based topic sentence to introduce the case based cases
    -Better to write a nice intro sentence for each case to show immediately why we are using them
    -Explain why the case is important
    -explain central principle
        -explain what you have learned

-Use a conventional cause
    "In cases where the courts have found the element of untenantablity satisfied, ..."
  
-Complete with explaining why the courts concluded this
    "... they focused on the severity of the interference, the degree of the landlord's control over the leased space, and the degree of specificity about the interference in the lease."(string cite here)

-It needs citation to authority
    -string cite for all 4 cases
        -Order cases rule 1.4
    -signal rule 1.2
        -See implied (use short form where needed)

Use relevant facts of cases:
"For instance in Aro Glass, the tenant leased space to use for a used car lot and in the lease, the landlord agreed to correct the deep puddles that occurred on the lot because the tenant knew that this would drive potential customers away.  The landlord failed in several attempts to correct the puddles and the tenant moved out. Aro Glass, 12 Wn. App. 6
In another case..."
 
-Can use themed base in your paragraphs.
-Use tenant and landlord when talking about cases other than Orca and Amber.
-Use the terms Amber, Orca and Aloha.

Cases for Amber
-Apply same technique
    -develop principle based sentences with cite
    -present facts with short cite

Orca's cases
    -3 to 4 paragraphs
Amber's case
    -1 paragraph
Pages
    -1 1/2 pages

Write the case based presentations for Orca and Amber
Cite 7

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Novemeber 19th Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
November 19, 2009

11/19 - Decedents/Domestic
11/24    - Pleadings due - domestic
12/1 - KS Contracts
12/3 - review/some KS
12/8 - KS Contracts
12/10 - Final

Pleadings: Jurisdiction, Venue, Signature
Double Spaced


Two main clauses on a will:
1. Dispositive clause
    - the passing of property indicates whom the money, property, ownership rights will be given
    1. Request: gift of personal property
    2. Devise: gift of real property

2. Residuary clause
    - the rest of the property indicates where the remaining assets of the estate shall go after bills have been paid
    -usually donated

-Heirs are not responsible for debt after going through assets of trustee

Simultaneous death clause
    -usually only if you are married
    -assumed the beneficiary died first
    -presumed that your family will get your property

-Effectuate the intent of the testator/deceased
    -if you die without a will
    -guessing on your idea of distribution

Executor
    -if you have a will, the one appointed for handling the estate

 Personal Representative
    -if you do not have a will, the one appointed for handling the estate

Guardianship Clause
    -here is what we want for the children
    -with no will, the court will appoint and is usually your closest living relative and will continue to try
    -if no one is found, they become a ward of the state
    -you are not required to choose a relative
    -parens patriae: best interest of the child

Trust Clause
    -a device whereby the trustor takes property into a trust that is administered by a trustee for a beneficiary
    -create for specific use of your property, control over your money

Types of trust
1. inter vivos
    -you create in your lifetime
2. causa mortis (testamentary trust)
    -you use your will to create it (you die)

Charitable Trust: interest to your favorite charity

Spendthrift Trust: small amounts are paid off to beneficiary

Special Purpose: specific purpose

Special Needs Trust: dependent on government benefits, you put money here to keep them

Attestation Clause
    -short paragraph written between the signature that the signature is mine and witnesses were there

Self-proving Affidavit
    -signed by testator that the signature is mine and witnesses were there

Statutory Elective Share
    -You can not disinherit a spouse
    -the disinherited spouse can either take what they got in the will or whatever the state's automatic percentage is (30-50%) of the state
    -only in a non community property state
        - that all property after the marriage is jointly owned
    -in community property states
        -the property is already owned by the spouse, no need for clause

"Per Stirpes" (right of representation)
    -indicates that is a particular beneficiary dies before the testator, the share shall pass to his lineal descendants per stripes
    -pass property to your lineal descendants (directly related by blood and are lower on the family tree)
    -pro children or pro grandchildren?
        -grandchildren only get what their parents represent

to my lineal descendants per capita - direct to grandchildren to split
to my lineal descendants per stirpes - to your children directly to split
grandchildren and children to share and share alike per capita - all split


-adopted children are the same as natural children
-illegitimate children are heirs of the mother but not of the father (must be acknowledged)

Probate
    -court procedure where the property is divided, whenever someone dies
    -Purpose
    1. verify the validity of will
    2. inventory of property of deceased
    3. provide creditors of the deceased opportunity to make claim against estate
    4. ensure that the title is transfered properly to beneficiary

-anyone can have a representative probate

Sequence of Probate
1. Petition
2. Administration is prepared
3. Oath of witness to will
4. A court file is opened
    -actual notice: known creditors, written notice to
        example: bank, visa, car, friends
    -constructive notice: unknown creditors, notice in the newspaper (legal notice), run for a certain period of time
        example: people that come forward with debts
    -WA 120 days statute of limitation on the creditor claim (from day of notice)
5. Inventory prepared and filed
6. An accounting is prepared and filed
7. Tax statements are obtained and filed
    -Death Taxes (inheritance taxes)
        -was designed to breakup estates believe government deserves it
        -up to 3.5 million exempt from tax
             -inheritance rate 55%
    Problems with this:
    1. Already taxed twice (income, corporate, then inheritance)
    2. You have to sell property to pay inheritance tax
8. Property is transfered
    -Receipt of beneficiary: it is received and then filed
    -Title has to be conveyed by personal representative's deed
        -can't give you a warranty deed because he is dead, so a different deed is needed
9. Closing documents prepared
    -petition for discharge: everything is done and you are released
   
Living Wills
    -not a will, not about living
    -actually medical directive
        -requests to pull plug, brain dead, vegetative state
        -clear, cogent, convincing evidence of wishes
        -Cruzan v. Missouri 1990
            -mva, parents wished to unplug after years, state says no, only takes living will due to constitutional obligation on life, liberty and property protection from the state, due process is needed
        -Quinlin (NJ)
        -Suhaivo (WA)

Online for free:  http://www.doh.wa.gov/livingwill

November 17th Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
November 17, 2009

How to take his exams
-Needs to be condescending, explain everything, pretend he knows absolutely nothing about the law or explanation
-Needs you to explain law and apply it
-Give you facts on purpose (but you can argue any side)
-You can quote his question in the essay
-If he asks a question he wants to hear all the torts or all the duties, even if you don't think it might be there



Real Estate

no lien affidavit - seller claims no liens on property
    -Construction liens - up until 90 days after completion to file the lien dates back to completion
        (used to be called these, but are now construction liens)
        -Mechanic's liens: landscapers, electricians
        -Materialmen's liens: who supply mechanics

Recording - filed in public record
    -law requires constructive notice
    -first in time, first in right
        -banks lending must record, if not recorded first lose rights to money first

Title Search
    -abstract: the report on the property

Title insurance
    -insurance that the title is a true representation of the property
        -covers possible hidden liens

Claim of lien
    -order to force the owner to pay the amount due

Degree of Title   Page 355
    Fee simple absolute - highest ownership you can have
        -means you have 100% ownership and 100% of title
            -married 50% ownership and 100% title
Other degrees in descending order:
    Life estate - You don't own it but can live in it
    Easement
    License
    Leasehold - possession of

Page 356-357
-Closing Standards
Banks require homeowners and title insurance
   

Estate Law
-your property is your estate

If you die with:  Intestacy in WA (RCW 11.04.015) (without a will)
Spouse and Kids: 
    -Spouse gets all community property and 1/2 of the separate property
    -Kids get 1/2 separate property

Spouse/Parents/Siblings but no kids:
    -Spouse gets all community property and 3/4 of the separate property
    -Parents/Siblings get 1/4 of separate property

Spouse, no kids, no parents, no siblings
    -Spouse gets all community property and all of the separate property

Kids only
    -per capita: every one gets an equal share
    -per stirpes: kids get equal share/grandkids share from kids

No spouse, no kids, no siblings
    -Parents

No spouse, no kids, no parents
    -Siblings

No spouse, no kids, no parents, no siblings
    -Grandparents

No spouse, no kids, no parents, no siblings, no grandparents
    -issue of Grandparents meaning Aunts and Uncles

No spouse, no kids, no parents, no siblings, no grandparents, no aunts, no uncles
    -"Escheats" to the state of WA

Page 365
Testator
    -one who leaves property

Heir
    -one who receives property

Devise
    -real property

Bequeath
    -personal property

How to revoke a will
1. Intentional destruction
    -you don't want it anymore, simply revoked, must be intentional
2. Superseding will
    -will #2, revoking prior rules
3. Interlineation
    -lining out, revoking only parts of the will
    -can not add to the will with this (equal dignities rule)

In order to make a will:
  *important for final*
Capacity    
    -Competency:  (loosely defined)
        -Nature and extent of property owned (what they own)
        -Natural objects of your bounty (who your heirs are)
    -Need to be over 18

Amendment of a will
    -called a codicil
        -to make a minor change to the will
    Why codicils are a bad idea:
    1. Required to be executed with the same formalities of the original will
    2. Once you start modifications, it is not structurally sound


Form of a Will
1. In Writing
    -Oral wills (nuncupative will) are largely ineffective
        Is valid if:
        -"foxhole wills" you are deployed military
        -$500 cap
        -no real property
    -Holographic will
        -handwritten will by testator
        Is valid if:
        -entirely in hand of the testator
        -witnesses
        -some exclude real property

2. Must be signed by testator
    -not valid if not signed

3. Witnessed
    -varies sometimes 2 or 3
    -must be disinterested (not taking under the will)
    -must see testator sign and witnesses signs (depends on state)
   

Monday, November 16, 2009

November 16th Notes

Legal Research & Writing
November 16th

Citing to secondary sources
    -only look at BlueBook rules

Law Review Article
    -Author's full name
    -Title of Article (italicized)
    -Volume #
    -Abbreviated law review name (table T.13)
        -If not there, make your own within the rules
    -Beginning Page #
    -Year of Publication (in parenthesis)

Richard A. Posner, Goodbye to the Bluebook, 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1343 (1986).
(this is the article she liked)

*Citing to University of WA Law Review  (Wash. L. Rev.)*

Books
-For Single Volume
    -Author's full name
    -Title (italicized)
    -Section, Paragraph, Page # (only use page # when you don't have the others)
    All together in one parenthesis:
        -Edition # (in parenthesis)
        -Publisher (in parenthesis) (legal include, non-legal do not)
        -Year of Publication (in parenthesis)
    Examples: Hornbooks

-For Multi-Volume
    -Volume #
    -Author's full name
    -Title (italicized)
    -Section, Paragraph, Page # (only use page # when you don't have the others)
    All together in one parenthesis:
        -Edition # (in parenthesis)
        -Publisher (in parenthesis) (legal include non-legal do not)
        -Year of Publication (in parenthesis)
    *For multiple authors, you can write all out or use (et al.)*
    Examples: Treaties, Practice Books

A.L.R. (American Law Review)
    -Author's name
    -Word "Annotation"
    -Title (italicized)
    -Volume #
    -Abbreviated title of the book itself (see her chart not in Bluebook)
    -Beginning Page # of Annotation
    -Year of Publication (in parenthesis)

Short Form
    -Author's last name
    -supra (do not use for cases or statutes) (do not use id)
    -Section, Paragraph, Page # (only use page # when you don't have the others)


Orca Case
Update:
-Mr. Metzger (from Aloha) gave us a letter from Amber Properties
-Letter stating they reviewed specifications for filter from Orca, that the filter works well and that they are approving their second shift
*Copy of the letter under projects*

How this affects our elements?
Elements:
    1. Landlord's Act
        *Undisputed now*
        -No longer disputed due to this letter
        -Landlord clearly knows what is going on and approved it
    2. Conditions "untenantable"
        -Disputed   
    3. Notice
        -Undisputed
    4. Tenant Vacate
        -Undisputed

Discussion
    -Mention undisputed
        -Landlord's Act, Notice, Tenant Vacate
    -Only "untenantable" conditions are disputed

Updated Roadmap:
STATEMENT
ISSUES STATEMENT
DISCUSSION SECTION OUTLINE
Introduction
    -General Rules Paragraph
    -Transition (Roadmap Paragraph)
        -Undisputed
            -Landlord's Act (cite case)
            -Notice (cite case)
            -Vacate (cite case)
        -Disputed
            -Untenantable (cite cases)
Disputed Element - untenantable
    -Specific Rules -  untenantable
    -Analogous case presentation
        -Cases favoring Orca
        -Cases favoring Amber
Arguments
    -Orca's arguments
        -Fact based (plain)
        -Case based (analogous)
        -Policy based
    -Amber's arguments
        -Fact based (plain)
        -Case based (analogous)
        -Policy based
    -Orca's Rebuttal
Mini-Conclusion - untenantable
CONCLUSION


Use pages 102 and 237 for Book References

General Rules Paragraph
    -Do sentence for each piece
1. WA Practice
    Constructive Eviction is an outgrowth of the doctrine of actual eviction
    -Cite WA Practice
2. Explanation of Constructive Eviction
    -(Aro Glass/Coulos Cases)
3. Elements of Constructive Eviction
    1. Landlord's act   
    2. Conditions "untenantable"
    3. Notice
    4. Tenant vacate
4. Burden of Proof
   
Transition Paragraphs
    (start with the undisputed)(end with the disputed)
    -Undisputed Element
        -identify the element
        -provide explanation or definition (a rule with cite to authority)
        -Apply rule to the facts of the case
       
Example of Transition Paragraph
-Identify Element:
-Explain the Element: (cite here)
-Apply to the Facts:

Landlord's Case
The first element, landlord's act, is likely undisputed. 

For a constructive eviction to occur, it must be the act of the landlord or someone acting on the behalf of the landlord that is the cause of the interference to the the tenant, (no Pacific Reporter)

In Orca's case, this element is satisfied because it was Amber, the landlord, who gave permission to Aloha to begin the second shift operation that was caused the paint problems for Orca.


-Repeat with the other two undisputed
-End with the disputed element untenantable
    -(development is later, no need to explain)

Dobrentai v.Piehl
-Element: Landlord's Act Case
-Not Helpful
-Rejected

Lindblom v. Berkman
-Element: Untenantable
-Facts: Classy Hotel leases lobby to Peddler and made if difficult to get to other stores and rooms, Peddler blocked staircase, Tenant losing money
-Constructive Eviction YES!
(How good/bad the space needs to be to be untenantable is our job)
-Accepted

John B. Stevens & Co. v. Pratt
-Element: Untenantable
-Facts: Deteriorated docks and warehouses, too unsafe, ships doc elsewhere, lose business
-Constructive Eviction YES!
-Rule: If the landlord agrees to keep something in repair, then landlord is obligated otherwise constructive eviction (will need page # to cite)
-Accepted

Myers v. W. Farmer's Ass'n
-Element:
-Not Helpful
-Rule: Good explanation of Constructive Eviction (need page # to cite)
-Rejected

Farrow v. Storck
-Element: untenantable
-Facts: Silent Movie Theater has Tap Dance studio move in above, ruined business, during the depression, projector also had technical issues
-Could help Amber's case
-Not sure

Erickson v. Elliott
-Element: Notice
-Rule: If you need a cite for Notice (cite page)
-Rejected

Untenantable Case Cite Rules (Specific Rules)
-Get the page numbers for all
-Write all the rules complete in a declarative sentence
    -Paraphrased rules
-Follow with full citation
-From general rule to specific

Cases to Cite:
-WA Chocolate:
    -Where landlord retains control of part of premises, retains duty to keep that part tenantable
-Aro Glass:
    -Where lease contains specific provision covering the problem that develops landlord has breached covenant
-Aro Glass:
    -Landlord's breach of lease covenant that causes property to become no longer fit for purposes intended is substantial interference- untenantable
-Can add more cases if you find them

Which cases favor Orca?
-Needs Constructive Eviction granted
WA Chocolate - Rats
Aro Glass - Puddles
Lindblom v. Berkman - Docks
John B. Stevens & Co. v. Pratt - Huckster


-Need to figure out how these cases affect Orca
    -Look at the facts and compare for each case (DO THIS FOR NEXT CLASS)

In which cases did the courts NOT grant constructive eviction?
-Favor Amber
Farrow v. Storck- Tap Dancing
May need more cases (only spend 30 minutes looking for another case)
    -Needs untenantable as an issue
    -Court says NO, it is tenantable

-Write
    General Rule
    Transitional
    Specific Rules
    -cite
-Cite 6
-Cases for Amber