Fundamentals of Legal Practice
November 24, 2009
Review Dec 3rd
Page 219 to end of book
Dissolution
-not called Divorce anymore
Statutory Marriage
1. license
2. marriage ceremony (w/ state authority)
3. competent parties (understand what you are doing)
-states and other countries vary with what marriage is, if the marriage is valid where you entered it, it is valid everywhere else
-WA will hold it valid if it is valid elsewhere Article IV § 1
Common Law Marriage
1. parties of opposite sex living as a married couple
2. holding themselves at married in the public for a minimum period of time set by statute (generally 7 years)
-WA does not have common law marriage
-Creditors, like banks, do not like people not saying they are married later for joint liability
Palimony
-Marvin v. Marvin 1976
-were not married but she took his name, had joint banking, and he stated he could get half of his possessions
-more of a contract issues
-promissory estoppel
-unjust enrichment
Dissolution of Marriage
Annulment
-declare the marriage was never valid
-void ab initio (from the beginning)
-limited grounds for an annulment
1. Sham Marriage: no one intended for the marriage (usually green card)
2. Bigamy: can't have two spouses at same time, second marriage is void
3. Underage Party: can't be under 18 or 16 w/ parental consent
4. Incest: can not marry relatives, WA can not marry cousins (usually 1st)
5. Mental Incompetency: contractual competency
6. Intoxication: need to be very drunk to the point you don't know
7. Duress: forcing marriage (shotgun wedding)
8. Physical Incompatibility: refusal to ever have sex
Dissolution
1. Specific Grounds are required
-all 50 states are "no fault" meaning, you do not need grounds to divorce, no proof needed
-You once had to prove: (no longer the case)
-mental cruelty, adultery, abandonment, physical abuse
-WA does not require any specific statements
-others just want it stated specifically
2. Minimal Grounds
1. allege "irretrievably broken" or irreconcilable differences
2. minimal residency requirement meet
-court has an interest in your marriage
-Nevada has a quicker divorce because the residency is easy 6 weeks
-if your spouse wants to divorce you, there is nothing you can do
-you can slow it down w/ counsel or tactics to save marriage
-interlocutory period (cooling off period)
-WA is 90 days
-You can do a divorce by yourself with
Complete agreement on:
1. Property
2. Custody
3. Support (spousal and child)
-otherwise you will need a lawyer
Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
-petitioner (filer) and respondent
Custody
-WA visitation rights
-Grandparents can not petition for visitation rights
Alimony (now called Maintenance)
Two forms
-Rehabilitative
-Permanent
Custody
-Physical Custody
-where the child is, who's care
-Legal Custody
-responsibility of making decisions on the child's behalf
-Joint Custody
-courts prefer to split both
-if travel is hard, legal custody is still split
-if you can not split custody (generous visitation)
"Tender Years Doctrine"
-children under 5 belong with mother
-old school thinking
Now is: "Best interest of the child test"
-who is the caretaker of the child (usually the woman)
Division of Property
-as long as it is done without coercion and with full disclosure
-property agreement, does not have to be 50/50
-important for both parties to have their own lawyers
-in case there are challenges
-community property statements
-become tenants in common instead
-not everything is community property
-gifts, wills, some property
Division of Indebtedness
-responsibility of outstanding debt
-judges decision on debt is not binding on creditors
-take all debt responsibility
-then you split the assets
$200,000 in assets
$140,000 in debt
take the debt and get $170,000 in assets
-that way you don't have to worry about spouse defaulting
-2 list property approach (make two list that are equal in value and give to spouse)
Final judgment of dissolution of marriage
-document finalizes marriage (after 90 day cooling period)
-either side can finalize it, not the petitioner
Contracts
-law is basically contracts, torts and criminal law
K = contracts
contracts
-legally binding agreement
(promises can be broken because they are not enforceable)
3 Parts of a Contract
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration - quid pro quo (this for that)
-need some understanding
-competency
-legal agreements
-in order for there to be a valid contract you only need 3, but to enforce it, it must be in writing
-damages you seek are to make you whole after the breach (varies on what you are seeking)
-personal service contractors can not be enforced with specific performance
(making a painter paint a house, then he ruins the house leading to another lawsuit)
Common law of Contracts
UCC - Uniform Commercial Code
-bulk sale transfers, banking system
-to get all the states to agree on business contractors
-Louisiana does not have this, they use Napoleonic Code
Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts
Unilateral:
-personal contracts: usually unilateral
Bilateral:
-business contracts: agree to perform
Executed Contract:
-both parties have already performed
Executory Contract
-one party have performed and the other has yet to perform
Express Contracts
-parties lay out what they want and why the want it (negotiating)
-oral or writing (most contracts are oral)
Implied Contracts
-must look at conduct to figure out what they want
(ordering food)
Valid Contracts
-fully enforceable by the parties
-properly formed with O, A, C
Void Contracts
-totally unenforceable (never)
2 Types
1. Illegal
2. Violate public policy (paying someone to vote)(money to divorce, inherit)
-destructive to society
Voidable Contracts
7 Types
(means one of the parties can opt out of the contract)
-they are sometimes enforceable
-Minor: minor can leave anytime
-Fraud:
-Duress: forced into contract
-Drunk:
-Insane:
-Undue Influence: usually family or friend
-Bilateral Mistake: both think they are dealing with the same thing but not
(either party can opt out)
Quasi Contracts (are not contracts) ("pretend")
-even though it is enforced as one
1. unjust enrichment- allow mistake to occur
-people should not be allowed to benefit from others mistakes when they have knowledge just to get the benefit
-painters coming to paint a house without a contract because they painted the wrong house
2. promissory estoppel- create the detrimental reliance
-being stopped from making promises that are not enforced
-makes you responsible for the promises you make
-"we could really use a guy like you" is not a job offer
*we pretend to prevent injustice