Monday, December 14, 2009

Winter 2010

 To all the readers of this blog:

Congratulations for making it through the first semester!  

I'm glad the notes have helped so many of you.  It's really helped me too.  I plan to do the same notes and tapes for next semester.  And as always, if you want to add to the notes, find something that needs a correction, or have a helpful resource or link, feel free to leave a comment and I will add it.

Have a great winter break!
Sarah B.


Also:
Joel posted this note from Bruce on the Paralegal Google group.
http://groups.google.com/group/uwparalegal/browse_thread/thread/3c45e10a6298c049?hl=en

*******************************************************
 I hope everyone has a safe and happy holiday season, and we’ll see you in January!!  

One more thought…I am currently scheduled for a 5-day arbitration beginning Jan 5th , the first night of class. They normally break at 5:00 pm, which means I should make class on time.  However, if we are in the middle of a witness it could go long, so if I am not there on time, never fear…I am on my way, and class WILL be held.  Since I’m never late, I don’t want anyone assuming its okay to leave at 6:05 pm because I’m probably dead.

Don’t forget to leave milk and cookies for Santa.

Best to all,
Bruce
*******************************************************


Course for Winter 2010        
PARA CP115 A     Litigation Basics       
Class Starts 01/04/2010 through 03/11/2010
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday  6:00pm-9:00pm
Health Sciences Building Wing T, Room 747 

Books For This Class:

WA Local, State, and Federal Rule Books 2010
-will need them starting week 3
-Available here for $213 and free shipping (12/14/09)
-Note: Older rule books are fine too
http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/159759/15581478/productdetail.aspx




Civil Litigation 5th edition by Kerley, Hames and Sukys
-Course #: EDP102382      
-Sections: PARA CP115 A
-ISBN: 9781428318397
-Title:  Civil Litigation (w/out Cd)
-Author:  Kerley
-Available here for $147.50 (12/14/09)
-Note: 4th edition is alright too
http://www.bookstore.washington.edu/default.taf?




Parking Questions:
Commuter Services
206-221-3701
3901 University Way NE
Monday - Friday   7:30am - 3:00pm

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Final Cram Sheet

FINAL CRAM SHEET

Civil Litigation
Rules of procedure
1. Federal
2. State
3. Local

¢ complaint
π plaintiff
∆ defendant
T/P third party

Basic complaint: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counterclaim: Defendant v. Plaintiff
Cross-claim: Defendant v. Defendant
Third Party: Defendant v. Defendant (not named by plaintiff)

Summons:
-formal notice of the suit
-the purpose is procedural due process
-it is procedural, your right to know, right to protect yourself
-summons and complaint must be served together
-server must be over 18 and not a party to the action
-Complaint initiates lawsuit

Affirmative Defense:
-relieves the defendant of liability even if allegations are true
-what do they give you that denials don't?  Nothing specific
Examples:
1. Res Judicata - released the case, case already ruled upon
2. Release - plaintiff releases the defendant from responsibility
3. Contributory Negligence - releases defendant if negligence proved on plaintiff
4. Comparative Negligence - in states where this is true, plaintiff get award even if negligent
5. Statute of Limitations - period of time from date that cause occurred to date filed

Always include:
1. Fails to state a cause of action
------(wore leopard shoes that offended someone) Admitted everything was true
2. Fault of Plaintiff
------ Other person's fault
3. Fault of Another
------ Someone else
4. Failure to Mitigate
----did not reduce injury or damage
   
Counterclaims
1. Compulsory: must bring counterclaim or will never be allowed to do so
2. Permissive: another claim against plaintiff not from the same matter
   
Third party complaint
-upon a person not party to action who may be liable
-what times would you not bring in another party that caused you injury?
    -doesn't know him (guy that fixed brakes for defendant)
    -laziness on rep.
    -relationship (boss, brother in law)
   
Dismissals
1. Involuntary: by opposition or court to throw it out
2. Voluntary: you have the right to dismiss your pleadings
3. With prejudice: it can not be raised again
4. Without prejudice: this is defective but you can try again

subpoena duce tecum
        -documents requiring party to attend and bring documents with them

Trial
Jury Selection - voir dire, speak the truth, from driver's licenses
-Peremptory challenge - attorney may dismiss jurors with no explanation
-Challenges for cause - dismiss juror for bias
-Jury usually 12, District 6
Opening Statements - before evidence, points they plan to make, defense can defer till after plaintiff shows case
-Why is it called that?  Nothing to talk about yet, no evidence
Plaintiff goes first Case in Chief
Direct Examination
-no leading questions, unless hostile, kid, foundation, expert
Cross Examination
-limited to issues in direct
Closing Arguments
-Plaintiff can have 2 closes
Jury Instructions
Jury Deliberations, Verdict, Judgment

CIVIL DISCOVERY
3 purposes:
1. Prepare case thoroughly
2. Clarify
3. Locate, Obtain, Preserve evidence
-The more we find out, the more we can reach settlement
-Federal Rule 26  discovery is broad, but not unlimited (mandatory disclosure)

3 examples where discovery limited
1. Doctor/Patient, spousal immunity, lawyer immunity
2. Work Product - thoughts and mental strategies
3. Experts not being called to witness
4. Annoyance, Embarrassment, Oppression

5 discovery tools
1. Depositions CR30
-non-party or party, oral, under oath, powerful, expensive,
-only tool that is 1. spontaneous 2. against non-party
2. Interrogatories CR33
-party, written, under oath, 30 days, inexpensive, limit 25 questions, discreet subpart
3. Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes CR34
-party, rule 34 request for production
4. Physical and Mental Exams CR35
-party, only if it is an issue, must be relevant
5. Request for Admission CR36
-party, written request or deny, streamlines trial, not really discovery meant to admit things so as not to prove them

-Sanctions available for parties that don't cooperate with discovery
--include: disallowed evidence, established facts, pleadings stricken, contempt, costs incurred
   
CRIMINAL LAW
-felony: loss of civil rights, over a year, in prison
-misdemeanor: 90 days in jail
-mala in se crimes: inherently evil
-mala prohibita: protecting society, revenue raising
-Burden of proof: presumption of innocence, jury, no appeal
-Motive is NOT an element of crime
-All crimes have intent(mental state)
-mens rea: guilty act w/ guilty mind
-actus rea: guilty act w/out guilty mind (the act)

Hate Crimes
-punishing at greater level
-against women, gays
-Matthew Shepard

Insanity
2 tests
1. M'naghten test - inability to tell right from wrong
2. Irresistible impulse (NY rule) - knew it was wrong, could not stop
   
Obligation to Disclose (from Brady)
Inculpatory(guilty) material - supports guilt of defendant
Exculpatory(innocent) material - supports innocence of defendant

Mens Rea w/ Small Children
-below 8, 8-12 presumed no mens rea can be rebutted, over 12 mens rea

Motion to Exclude (suppress)
-4th Amendment (search warrants and evidence) Mapp v. Ohio

Plea bargaining
-none for dangerous felonies, 90% cases are plea bargains

Miranda Warning
-police must give you prior to custodial investigation, must know your rights


Real Property
Fixtures
3 things to look at: (don't need all 3)
1. Attached/Affixed
2. Intent
3. Adaptation

Trade fixtures: goes with tenant 1. usually useless to new tenant 2. expensive
-must 1. repair  2. promptly

Mortgages:
1. Promissory Note: promise to pay
2. Trust Deed: security for note
    -no deficiency judgment and power of sale

Assumption of Mortgage - buyer assumes mortgage of seller(already has mortgage on property) and continue paying on mortgage  Due at sale clause

Subsequent Mortgage - much higher interest rate, risk of loan is increased
Purchase Mortgage - seller contract, installment contract, no bank (strict foreclosure)
Balloon Mortgage - adjustable rate, higher interest rate
Amortization - interest paid first

Easement
1. Appurtenant: dominant tenement can use servient tenement, dominant access to highway
2. Easement in Gross: benefits owner of easement, dominant cattle to pasture

Making an Easement
1. In Writing
2. By Implication - by necessity, you pay for easement
3. By Prescriptive right - start using easement 7-15 years

Co-Ownership
1. Tenancy in Common
-undivided, unlimited owners, different % of ownership, sell your %
2. Joint Tenancy w/ Rights of Survivorship
-when one dies, transfers to other automatically

Warranty Deed: seller has title to what he is selling guarantee
Quick Claim Deed: no guarantee, absolves all interest in property if any

Liens
No lien affidavit: seller claims none
Construction liens; up to 90 days after completion
    1. Mechanic's landscapers, electricians
    2. Materialmen's who supply mechanics

Recording
-public record: warns others of interest in property
-first in time, first in line

Estate Law
Die with Intestacy
-Spouse and Kids, Parents, Siblings, Grandparents, Aunts/Uncles, Escheats to state

Revoke a Will
1. Intentional Destruction
2. Superseding will
3. Interlineation: cross outs, can't add in equal dignities rule

Capacity:
-Competency: extent of property and who heirs
-Over 18

Holographic wills: handwritten by testator, witnessed, no real property
Will needs:
1. In Writing 2. Signed 3. Witnessed by disinterested: receives no benefits

Clauses:
1. Dispositive: to whom and what
2. Residuary: remaining assets

Guardianship Clause: children
Trust Clause: control over money
-inter vivos: in lifetime
-causa mortis: created when you die

-Can not disinherit a spouse

Per Stirpes: direct to children
Per Capita: direct to grandchildren

Probate
Purpose: verify will, inventory of property, satisfy creditors, title transfer
Actual Notice: to known creditors
Constructive Notice: in paper 120 days

Living Will: called Medical Directive
    -medical requests

Domestic Law
Statutory Marriage
1. license  2. marriage ceremony (w/ state authority) 3. competent parties
-if valid elsewhere, valid here

Common Law
1. living as married opposite sex 2. holding themselves as married 7 years

Annulment:
void ab intio
8 Kinds: Sham marriage, Bigamy, Underage, Incest, Mental Competency, Intoxicated, Duress, Physical Incompatibility

Dissolution: Specific Grounds, Minimal Grounds

Alimony (now called Maintenance)
2 forms: Rehabilitative and Permanent

Custody:
Physical and Legal, Usually joint
-Grandparents can not petition to get visitation
"Best interest of the child test"

Full disclosure for divorce:  to avoid Fraud and cause voidable contracts
-document finalizes marriage; interlocutory, after 90 day cooling period

Contracts
-legally binding agreement
3 Parts:  Offer, Acceptance, Consideration(quid pro quo)

Unilateral: personal contracts: usually unilateral
Bilateral: business contracts: agree to perform   
Executed Contract: both parties have already performed
Executory Contract: one party have performed and the other has yet to perform
Express Contracts: parties lay out what they want and why the want it (most oral)
Implied Contracts: must look at conduct to figure out what they want    (ordering food)

Valid Contracts: fully enforceable by the parties, properly formed with O, A, C

Void Contracts: totally unenforceable (never), destructive to society
-2 Types:
    1. Illegal
    2. Violate public policy (paying someone to vote)(money to divorce, inherit)

Voidable Contracts: means one of the parties can opt out of the contract, sometimes enforceable
-Minor, Fraud, Duress, Drunk, Insane, Undue Influence, Bilateral Mistake

Quasi Contracts: not contracts, enforced as one
1. unjust enrichment- allow mistake to occur, knowledge
2. promissory estoppel- create the detrimental reliance, responsible

"meeting of the minds"
"Master of the Offer"- set the circumstances
Objective theory of contracts: how reasonable person perceives offer, is there intent?

Kinds of Offers:
Requirement, Output, Services Needed, Cost Plus, Market Price

Terminate Offer:
1. Reject 
2. Revocation
    -Can not revoke: Options (money given), Detrimental Reliance, Firm Offer
3. Counteroffer
    -original offer lapses
4. Expiration of Time
5. Death
6. Insanity
7. Illegal after acceptance
8. Terms
9. Bankruptcy
10. Acceptance

Acceptance: silence is not acceptance, any manifestation except with Terms
-Mailbox Rule: acceptance of offer upon dispatch, rejection upon receipt

Not Voidable: Necessaries, Release contracts, Student Loans, Life Insurance

Rebutting a Contract:
1. Alcohol, Insanity, Minor
-Minors can disaffirm
2. Bilateral Mistake
3. Fraud: 7 types (material misrep, false, scienter, intent, reliance, reasonable, damanges)
4. Undue Influences: fools
5. Misrepresentation
6. Duress/Coercion

Consideration: legal value, not economic
-Peppercorn Theory: as long as you get something
-Past consideration is no consideration

Usury: illegal rate
 
Statute of Frauds: act for the prevention of frauds and perjuries
   
Must be in writing: (MY LEGS)
Why? Most likely to end up in court
1. Marriage: where marriage is the consideration
2. Year: must not be performable in a year by its terms
3. Land: buying and selling must be in writing
4. Executor of an Estate
5. Goods over $500
6. Surety-ship: signing off on a car loan

Anticipatory Breach (Repudiation not Breach):
-when one party in advance says they are not going to perform
1. Express: tell you they are not going to perform
2. Implied: haven't said they are going to not perform but it is assumed they won't
Remedy:1. Treat the contract as breached and hire someone else, sue for damages
         2. Do nothing and see if the person shows up and performs
               
Third Party Beneficiaries
1. Is the third party beneficiary intended or incidental?
    Incidentals: zero rights (did not mean to get)
    Intended: enforcement rights (meant to get)
2. Assuming intended is the third party beneficiary a creditor or a donee?
    Debt issue: they are a creditor, can sue either party
    If not, Donee: No consideration, it's a gift, can not sue on gift, can sue performer

On the Google Paralegal Group, Jeff W. has posted some exam questions as a download.
http://uwparalegal.googlegroups.com/web/Final+Review.doc?hl=en&gda=7SFR1EMAAACbEQH9Qd1M9dr3IisgL-4I8yWkrbQMLCApzUjeSH-SkL0tOdddf1a8xdn8S_rnmqoytiJ-HdGYYcPi_09pl8N7FWLveOaWjzbYnpnkpmxcWg
 
I also put them onto the Taped Lectures Page for download. 
http://www.soulee.net/Paralegal/Final+Review.doc

Good Luck Everyone!

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Decemeber 8th Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 8, 2009

For LITIGATION
Rule Books for next class
-need Local, State and Federal
-will need them starting week 3
Available here for $213 and free shipping (12/8/09)
http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/159759/15581478/productdetail.aspx

Also Civil Litigation 4edition Kerley, Hames and Sukys

      Course #: EDP102382      
      Sections: PARA CP115 A
      ISBN: 9781428318397
      Title:     Civil Litigation (w/out Cd)
      Author:  Kerley

http://www.bookstore.washington.edu/default.taf?


FINAL
37 questions

Fill in the blank or short answer   19 questions
-14 for 2pts
-4 for 4pts
-1 for 6pts
Most answer in 3 minutes

Multiple Choice    9 questions  all 2pts   18pts    3 minutes to answer
T/F    4 questions    all 2pts   8pts   3 minutes to answer
Short Essay     5 questions     all 24pts   24pts    answer in 60-90 minutes

emphasize breadth not depth



Contracts
-do contracts need to be in writing?
    -No, almost all of the time
    -Always a good idea to have them in writing

-You can have a valid contract that is not enforceable because it's not in writing

"An act for the prevention of frauds and perjuries" from 1677
-called now; Statute of Frauds
    -6 types of contracts must be in writing in order to be enforceable by law

There are the 6 the court will not enforce if not in writing:
(MY LEGS)
1. Marriage
    -when the marriage is the consideration (marry my daughter for company)
    -mutual promises to marry are unenforceable
    -Heart Balm Statutes

2. Year (must performed in a year) **always test on**
    -must not be performable in a year by its terms
    -contract to employ you until baseball teams wins world series
        -does not have to be in writing
        -it could happen next October
        -13 months or longer must be in writing
        -only by its terms it must absolutely happen in a year
        -if it can happen in the year, it does not need to be in writing
    -contract to employ you until baseball teams wins two world series
        -can't happen in one year so it must be in writing

3. Land
    -buying and selling must be in writing
    -you can have an oral lease
    -but most need everything in writing

4. Executor of an Estate
    -the person to carry out your death wishes
    -all contracts must be in writing

5. Goods over $500
    -depends on contract
    -they can be in subcontracted

6. Surety-ship
    -signing off on a car loan

These are the most contentious, most likely to end up in court
-No writing, No court
-does not make the contract invalid, or voidable, simply makes it unenforceable

Two Concepts not in Book:
1. Anticipatory Breach (Repudiation not Breach)
    -when one party in advance says they are not going to perform
    -if they perform after the date, it is a breach
    -if before
    -how can you have a breach when the date has not arrived?
    1. Express
        -tell you they are not going to perform
    2. Implied
        -haven't said they are going to not perform but it is assumed they won't
    Remedy: Victim (innocent party)
            1. Treat the contract as breached and hire someone else and sue for damages at the time you get the repudiation.
            2. Do nothing and see if the person shows up and performs
               
2. Third Party Beneficiaries
    -Contact with employer to pay your tuition
        -You benefit, what are the rights of the employer?

    1. Is the third party beneficiary intended or incidental?
        -every contract benefits someone other than the party
            -incidentals (paint my house, paint company gets money too)
        Incidentals: zero rights (did not mean to get)
        Intended: enforcement rights (meant to get)

            -Employer paying schooling, you are intended
            -if school closes down, you can sue school
            -if its a gift, can't sue employer
            -it its a debt, you can sue employer and school

    2. Assuming intended is the third party beneficiary a creditor or a donee?
        -is this a debt issue?
        -If so, they are a creditor.
            -Forgive debt if Holly babysits kids of Kyle who loaned Bruce money
                -Kyle is creditor and intended
                    -Kyle can sue either party for performance
        -If not, they are a donee.
            -Forgive the debt to Bruce by working at the mission
                -mission is a donee and intended   
                    -mission can sue you but not Bruce
                    -why?  No consideration, it's a gift, can not sue on gift

Monday, December 7, 2009

December 7th Notes

Legal Research & Writing
December 7th

Statement of Facts
-all legally significant facts
    -case based arguments
-background facts
    -time line of the case
    -client and problem
-Conclude with what you were asked to do
"You asked me to find out if Orca was constructively evicted..."

Issue Statement
-use under/does/when
Under WA common law, was Orca constructively evicted when...(facts from your case based arguments, 1 fact for each element)
-Good goal about 75 words
Contains a specific clause governing air handling system,
include facts of the case, air handling, repainting the yachts
Gripp all confirmed fumes ruined the paint
Orca repeated requests (5)
Orca moved out
-make sure it is a question

What facts to include:
    -Landlord's Act
    -Notice
    -Vacate
    -Untenantable
Parallelism

Conclusion
-begin by connecting
-hedge words possibly, probably, likely
-what will court
-must include constructive eviction

Because it satisfies all four elements,
-include the words "constructive eviction"
-Your recommendations
-how does constructive eviction arise
    -is an affirmative defense to action on contract
    -demand for payment of rent due, landlord suing for money

-what could orca do
no reason to send money to amber, we shouldn't file a lawsuit, we should send a letter to amber claiming the strength of constructive eviction
-may want to seek damages from amber for the repainting of the yachts

Revising
-get all the pieces together then
-past tense for other cases
-present tense for Orca

Editing
-word choice
--landlord &tenant terms for decided cases
--use orca, amber, aloha for our case

-lease clause pertaining to the air handling system's maintenance
-find "of" in the document and delete them.

first is full
every rule sentence---- pinpoint to wash reporter
all quotations
chunk paragraph for case--short form
no cites in argument section

courts do not argue, claim, allege, assert
courts, find, hold, conclude, observe, opine, rule

appellate courts can not find facts

www.readplease.com
From the first memo stuff


Background Facts on Orca:
Orca: professional yacht painter
    -owner, Gripp-All paint, include price of paint job
        Orca is well-known for its exquisite work in painting yachts, a reputation that took many years to build and is now in danger of being ruined.

Cost to yacht owner to paint a mega-yacht depends upon its size, ranges from $50,000 to
$500,000. Bennett’s costs to re-paint are about 60 – 75% of that amount depending upon the
amount of re-fairing that has to be done.

Bennett uses exclusively Gripp-All2 paint, which is designed specifically for use on fiberglass
yacht surfaces, and follows all of the manufacturer’s recommendations for its application.
Bennett turned to Gripp-All to determine what might be causing the problems, but Gripp-All
had no answers.

Amber: Real estate property manager

Aloha: Plastics textiles manufacturing for Yachts
    - owner

What the problem is:
As a result of the re-painting, Bennett’s once profitable business is losing money.
-Breach of contract
    -Look for Damages

-Constructive Eviction
    -Leasehold
    -Tenant is ousted by landlord
        -Did the landlord push him out?
        --Constructive Eviction (constructive = legal fiction)
-The landlord constructively put the tenant out by not making the land suitable for use

What were asked to do:
Sept. 18   Amber sent Bennett a letter demanding payment for the back rent (June, July, Aug., and Sept.) and for the remainder of the 7 year lease.

Bennett(Orca) wants to know what recourse he has.

Chronological list of facts:
include paragraph 9, quote
Official Listing

-Mar. 2007        -Orca leases 80,000 sq. ft. Westlake Bldg.
-July 2008        -Orca tries to lease the other 40,000 sq. ft.
-Sept. 2008        -Amber leases other 40,000 sq. ft. to Aloha
-Jan. 2009        -Orca's paint problems begin
-Feb. 2009        -Bennett's night visit; tells Gripp-All & Amber
-Feb. 9, 2009    -Letter from Gripp-All to Orca
-Feb. 16, 2009    -Orca letter to Amber; Bennett stops painting
-Mar. 1, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Mar. 18, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Apr. 3, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, nothing
-Apr. 15, 2009    -Bennett hears nothing, Bennett calls Aloha & learns details of second shift; calls Amber - nothing.
-Apr. 16, 2009    -Bennett calls Amber, tells about Aloha call, nothing
-May 15, 2009    -Orca moves out of Westlake Bldg.
                              -Orca sends letter to Amber
-Sept. 18, 1009    -Amber letter demanding payment

Friday, December 4, 2009

December 3rd Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 3, 2009

General Assent
- free, informed, & voluntary

1. Alcohol - insanity - minor
    -no meeting of the minds
    -child can not give consent

-Dealing with Minors
    -Minor can disaffirm a contract
    -When you deal with minors they can void a contract at any time
        -even after a reasonable time once they are 18
    -***a contract is voidable at the option of the minor***

-Contracts with Minors that are Not Voidable
1.Contracts of necessaries
    -food, shelter, health insurance, clothing
2. Release Contracts
    -personal injury release
3. Student Loans
4. Life Insurance

Aftermath of a Minor disaffirming:
Traditional : Adult gets nothing, do not deal with minors
Modern: Minor has a duty to return anything left, and pay for part used
Very Modern: Make the adult whole


-If the Minor lied about their age:
Traditional: Doesn't matter, do not deal with minors
Modern: Minor loses right to disaffirm if they lie about their age

-Parents are not liable for their children's contracts

Alcohol
-intoxicated by drugs or alcohol
-must be so much they had no idea what was going on

Insane
-K are voidable
-if they have a guardian, the contract is void

2. Bilateral mistake
    -you have an obligation to find out details of the deal
    -in some circumstances it can be voidable

3. Fraud
    -1. material misrep. of fact
    -2. false
    -3. scienter (knowledge)
    -4. intent to induce
    -5. actual reliance
    -6. reasonable
    -7. damages

4. Undue influence
    -confidential relationship
    -unfair bargain
        -one party fools another into signing a contract
        -usually family taking advantage of other family members

5. Misrepresentation - 6 parts

6. Duress/Coercion
    -never really see this happen except really hard economics times



How to have a contract:
Offer
    -definite
    -communicated to offeree
    -10 ways to terminate

Acceptance
    -any manifestation of assent (not silence)
    -"master of offer" otherwise any reasonable method
    -mailbox rule

Consideration
    -legal valve, not economic value
        -both parties do not need equal value
    (anything the promisor has a legal rights to do or refrain from doing)
    -ample consideration
    -illusory
    -past/legal duty

    -Peppercorn Theory:
        -old English cases where a house can be considered for a peppercorn   
        -as long as each party is getting something
            (courts don't care if it's a bad deal)

-If there are no considerations, it is a gift
    -Example: "I'll pass you." (no requirements from you)
    -gifts are unenforceable

Past consideration is no consideration.
    -consideration has already taken place
    -Example: "Paint my house, for the rides I gave you!"
        -Not a contract, needs to be something new ("Paint my house for a ride next week.")
    -Doesn't count if you are required by law or contract to do it
        -firefighters, must put out fires can't ask for payment
"ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration"
    -boilerplate reference to make sure the consideration is met

Objective theory of Ks (not subjective intent)
Master of the Offer (bears the risk of misunderstandings in manner/method of acceptance)
"Meeting of the minds"


Exception to the rule of consideration for each side:
1. Pledges to Charity
    -there is consideration to the charity
    -quasi-contract formed
        -detrimental reliance to the charity

2. Modify a contract for the sale of goods

-Courts do not generally examine the sufficiency of consideration
    -illusory consideration
        -later seeing consideration is only on one side
        -promise to do something but don't have to do it
    -unconscionability
        -one side has a greater value consideration than the other

Usury
    -charging illegal rate
    -Banks, credit unions exempt
    -really made for loan sharks

Licenses
    -contract for services to perform and they are not properly licensed
    -failure of consideration
        -if it requires certificate of competency than it is failure
    -mala prohibita: not morally reprehensible (bad thing but not a true crime)

Agreements to not compete
    -employment contracts where they can not work in the field/miles
        -truly are illegal contracts on restraint on trade
        -BUT the law does enforce them though
            -as long as they are reasonable in scope and time
       
*******Contracts are easy to form but many are not enforceable*******


REVIEW FOR FINAL

Start page 219

Civil Litigation
    -lightly covers this, no essay, just the basics
    -some questions covered in class
    -basic formats, Not where things go
    -Need to know: complaint, counter claim, cross-claim, third party complaint,
    -Summons: explain due process, role of a summons
    -nothing on serving,  *who can serve though* paralegals can serve!
    -no pleadings
    -affirmative defense: what do they give you that denials don't
        -nothing specific

    Counterclaims
        -permissive rather than compulsory
            -one has to be done
            -same nexus of operative facts (same event)
            -must be brought or you give up the right to bring it up
                -why? repeat traffic, it is the same lawsuit
    Third party complaint
        -what times would you not bring in another party that caused you injury?
            -doesn't know him (guy that fixed brakes for defendant)
            -laziness on rep.
            -relationship (boss, brother in law)
    No defaults, no motions, no subpoenas
    Dismissals
        -involuntary or voluntary
            -involuntary (by opposition or court to throw it out)
            -voluntary (you have the right to dismiss your pleadings)
        -with prejudice or without prejudice
            -with (it can not be raised)
            -without (this is defective but you can try again)

    subpoena duce tecum
        -documents requiring party to attend and bring documents with them

    trials, nothing in depth
    jury selection -
        false used to be registered voters, now it comes from driver's licenses
        book wrong

    voir dire - french "to speak the truth"
    Page 251
        peremptory challenge -
        challenges for cause -
    Jury usually 12
    district 6
   
    Why is it called an opening statement?
        -no evidence presented, nothing to talk about yet
   
Direct examination
    -civil trial has both right to cross examine
        -criminal too
    -only that the other side discussed

CIVIL DISCOVERY
-what it is, where we are going with this
page 265 Why?  the more we find out, the more we can reach settlement
-federal rule 26  how broad that is, but not unlimited
-3 examples where discovery limited page 267
        -doctor, lawyer, spouse
        -work product
        -lacking relevance
    -why it is better to have injustice done in trial than destroy
        importance of confidentiality
page 271
    -5 discovery tools
        advantages and disadvantages

most from notes, some book, just from class discussion

discreet subpart:
    -separate interrogatory (can not get around them with extras)
physical and mental examinations:
    -must be relevant topic in lawsuit, be an issue in the lawsuit

All short essays

request for admissions
    -streamlines trial
    -need to do homework in order to use this
    -are one of the five tools but not discovery at all
    -using it to use the other side to admit things so you dont have to prove them
        -they do not discover anything, not learning information
            -to simply and streamline trial

-sanctions available for parties that don't cooperate with discovery
    -problems

CRIMINAL LAW
-not a lot on the examination

-mala in se, mala prohibita
-motive is an element of crime: false
-do not confuse motive and intent (mental state) did you know?

-hate crimes women, sexual orientation

-insanity: know the two tests M'naghten test and irresistible impulse (NY rule)
    -must be insane legally

criminal law burden of proof
    -presumption of innocence, jury, no appeal

Mens re
small children do under 8 , 8-12, over 12
Not all minors are small children
get rid of presumption - rebutt the presumption
page 308
Discovery
-exculpatory: you did it and
-inculpatory:
---know the reversal Brady v. maryland

what amendment 4th: suppressing evidence  Matt v. Ohio
exclusion of evidence

Miranda rights and decisions

Tuesday: contracts and then finish review

No essays, just short answers

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

December 1st Notes

Fundamentals of Legal Practice
December 1, 2009


Books for next set of classes are very expensive.
Books: Local, State, Federal Rules
Perkins law firm may be offering them. WA Rule books, can be any year. Every law firm has them, call around town.


***FINAL next week***

Contracts
1. Offer
2. Acceptance
3. Consideration

Offer
- someone has to initiate process, to enter a K(contract)
1. Must be definite (clear)
2. Communicated to the offeree

- When courts look at K was there a "meeting of the minds"
- Offers can not be third party (watch example)
-Just looking to see if there was intent, keep it simple

Exception to Rule:
Nordstrom ad in paper for shoes
-yes it is definite, yes communicated to offerees
-it's an offer to negotiate
-they may not have enough shoes for the entire city, not unlimited supply

Exception to the Exception:
-merchant puts specific specificity in the ad
- 4 at this price, while they last, first come first serve basis, vin # in car ads

Statements that are not Offers
1. Offers made in jest (joking about selling car for $1)
-if a reasonable person perceives it as a real offer, it may not be in jest
-"Objective Theory of Contracts"  how the reasonable person next to you perceives offer, is there intent?
 Example:
"I'd really love to sell you my stereo"
-is it definite? YES why? sounds like commercial, sounds believable to OTC
-is it communicated to the offeree? YES

2. Social Invitations

3. Offers to negotiate or receive offers from others

Special Kinds of Offers
1. Requirements contract offers
- I will buy all the carrots I need.

2. Output contract offers
-I will buy all the carrots you have.

3. "Services as needed" contract offers
-lawnmowing as needed

4. "Cost plus" contract offers
-sell plus a profit %

5. Contract offers referring to market price


Ways to terminate an offer
-offers do not come back to life once they are terminated, the offer is lapsed
-it must be a new offer
1. Rejection
-rejected from the offeree

2. Revocation
-when the offeror takes back an offer
-at any time, even if he said he will not revoke the offer
Some offers can not be revoked:
1. Options
-give money to keep offer open (a consideration)
2. Situations involving detrimental reliance
-relying on the fact the offer is open (moving for a job)
3. Firm Offer
-signed promissory note to not revoke (merchant's usually)

3. Counteroffer ***(always asked on final)***
-if the offeree makes an offer to the offeror the original offer dies
-I won't give you $500 for the watch, but will give you $300.
-can not change your mind and take original offer, it was terminated
mirror image rule:
-any slight deviations terminates the offer and is a counteroffer
-most courts have gone away from this rule
-examples: payments plan, value of extra items

4. Expiration of Time (reasonable)
-putting a time frame on the offer
-finding decade old ad in box is no longer an offer
-depends on item for sale: gold coin, ice cream cone, used car

Can not form a contract if:
5. Death of either party
6. Insanity of either party

7. Illegality after the offer but before the acceptance
-if the subject matter was illegal when the contract was formed it was void
-needs to be illegal after the offer

8. Terms
-offers lapse when they say they will
-specific terms in the offer
"Master of the Offer" - the offeror sets the circumstances of the offer

9. Bankruptcy
-the bankrupt party can no longer can accept contracts
-the party in charge of their bankruptcy is in charge of their contracts

10. Acceptance
-when the offer is accepted, it becomes a contract

Acceptance
-any manifestation of assent (agreement)
-only exception is terms (it may say it needs to be accepted in a certain way)

Silence is not acceptance
-You can't force acceptance on an offeree
-Exception: if the offeree says silence can be acceptance

The mailbox rule ***will be on final***
-acceptance of an offer binding upon dispatch
-once I write a letter, I accept offer to buy the car then mail it
-rejection/revocation of an offer is binding upon receipt
Example: page 424 Sally and Mark offer
-the offer is not revoked, there was a valid acceptance prior to revoke
-they needed to add terms to the offer regarding acceptance/revocation

Competent Parties
-must be competent, same as marriage and wills
-low standard
-general presumption you are competent
-what you have and heirs